From: hasufell <hasufell@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] cmake-utils.eclass and bug 475502
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 00:15:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E71774.8030702@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51E712C6.2070003@gentoo.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 07/17/2013 11:55 PM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote:
>
>
> It is my understanding that if you directly use a function from an
> eclass you are REQUIRED to inherit that eclass. Given that kind
> of sanity would have prevented these failures I find it difficult
> to believe my understanding is wrong, but I am willing to learn.
>
> I think I'll start inheriting base.eclass so I can use multilib
> functions. I mean, base.eclass inherits eutils.eclass which
> inherits multilib.eclass so it should work out fine, right?
>
You are wrong. What matters is the API of an eclass and how it is defined.
There is no such definition of base.eclass guaranteeing that it will
always either a) inherit eutils.eclass or b) provide certain functions
from eutils.eclass (maybe by defining them directly in the future).
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJR5xd0AAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzaxQH/0HZgEuSFwxO9yAwktAFLlW4
FdvNaUS+bn1oYGi/0vr/7E/j17ZH5/0nych/kw7kOa6009BpBjzdmDeAeZhIGI3n
tGGJtYNAsnZ16Rp7yrD0IZNj71ozSiLr6cBJs6m4rpOEJls9O0I1qazxnD+45o6W
iPfiDpfcUPFmTa/P3PJ69lAlNQA3EymmKXfB5SJdbt3QELxQR6wGdnpfrev0ieiG
gwpmzQzVjgt/PBpw4+tH/HFNdEXF+YjfbGGXoYNkO0FS+GppMtKaTYLEzbLPVORz
1v1oBWw/Ysz7CYML1C5R+uZpbf8cZK26mrQMj5gOSeyem/o5vgD7R3uhHFAgsgs=
=7JSh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-17 22:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-17 20:57 [gentoo-dev] cmake-utils.eclass and bug 475502 hasufell
2013-07-17 21:17 ` Chris Reffett
2013-07-17 21:28 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2013-07-17 21:34 ` hasufell
2013-07-17 21:42 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2013-07-17 21:47 ` hasufell
2013-07-17 21:55 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2013-07-17 22:15 ` hasufell [this message]
2013-07-18 7:06 ` Michał Górny
2013-07-18 22:11 ` Zac Medico
2013-07-17 23:09 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-07-18 16:40 ` Alexis Ballier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51E71774.8030702@gentoo.org \
--to=hasufell@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox