From: "Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina" <zerochaos@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] cmake-utils.eclass and bug 475502
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 17:28:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E70C8B.9050808@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51E709F5.8020802@gentoo.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 07/17/2013 05:17 PM, Chris Reffett wrote:
> On 07/17/2013 04:57 PM, hasufell wrote:
>> I know there was an announcement about the upcoming change to
>> cmake-utils.eclass, however... it is not enough to give a deadline
>> without caring if people actually fixed it by then.
>
>> By doing that you risk breaking stable packages which is not
>> trivial.
>
>> You _must_ do a tinderbox run, test that stuff in an overlay or
>> whatever. You are responsible for ALL reverse deps.
>
>> The way it was done... was not appropriate. Please be more careful
>> next time. There are still incoming bugs about broken base_src_*
>> calls. (see the tracker)
>
>
> I discussed this with hasufell on IRC, but I'll lay out the response
> on the list too. Yes, this was my fault. We (KDE team) tested in our
> overlay, but none of the packages there use the base_src_* calls,
> which is why it didn't come up in testing, and I did not realize that
> there were packages that did rely on the implicit base inherit to call
> base_src_* directly.
...and that is why it isn't permitted to directly use an eclass that you
don't inherit. While I agree testing could (should) have been better,
the fact that people ignore the rules for writing ebuilds shouldn't
entirely fall on the KDE team.
- -Zero
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJR5wyLAAoJEKXdFCfdEflK0LsP/3nXF+sRXcrRBmkysF7mLGjP
7iJ9Wwh2VkJyPihYxvG1O7YQkoMr+ohiQvMg6a0SbK6CPzND6Wu2d80r9/5DUUOx
NUqvtbX+SdNIj/VgoYC4aDuS6ln+3BDENR5JT90jfs1v7HNh1G/bSA78ppj1cDS7
Hsnym7pQxRYLnQuDbitVeFKp2UHBchXAkoaW8QJ/pf4FQwiXX0JXmOdt+ogCICGC
W6YP4fbt4zv4zKpt3AFD9jKXle4wcCoAXjixOIfdWSURy+BFWGDJXOKuPsqaXFki
U4qlbOI6xrf7l5ApmjZOndfarqGiwSfxV3qOLKglyHQp3I63FXfAqiVvH6uz8g2L
YVXqZ7BrkZKMADfR+Ha8nHbyW0CX0Z4iK62P/BPH4aLfLPzJKZa6804++a2i7Vx/
0EfB4rSSYC6IAMWhSxCJD5SL0q1MBefNAGFttVO5gGMUbyoIZ2YGd4fNW6bLFffu
Ca3twnU5yvvjn9auofWsh6Mji6U76L4xcVN/SUSI4ASC1q0GtPs6BbHI+WY4mo40
lYJUe3wXK3LgUfdDcrw9LennsO71lE96OuM1dhwxqrnIexAyKKIBMQtzIzYekBJx
Q3D6s3sCtxgOOhbDpWFp1rEohmHLY6SJzbMW9+BbN6+rEqZw0o11DYivOfiwSwso
wgRZQ55XSKzpZVPdifhp
=q7zW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-17 21:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-17 20:57 [gentoo-dev] cmake-utils.eclass and bug 475502 hasufell
2013-07-17 21:17 ` Chris Reffett
2013-07-17 21:28 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina [this message]
2013-07-17 21:34 ` hasufell
2013-07-17 21:42 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2013-07-17 21:47 ` hasufell
2013-07-17 21:55 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2013-07-17 22:15 ` hasufell
2013-07-18 7:06 ` Michał Górny
2013-07-18 22:11 ` Zac Medico
2013-07-17 23:09 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-07-18 16:40 ` Alexis Ballier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51E70C8B.9050808@gentoo.org \
--to=zerochaos@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox