From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB1961381F3 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 21:24:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E212DE0B98; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 21:24:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 037FFE0B95 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 21:24:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.3.7] (cpe-69-207-16-110.buffalo.res.rr.com [69.207.16.110]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: blueness) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 07FE133E6C8 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 21:24:40 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <51D1F3F7.8000105@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 17:26:15 -0400 From: "Anthony G. Basile" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130628 Thunderbird/17.0.7 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-kernel] Proper distribution integration of kernel *-sources, patches and configuration. References: <20130701164149.131490f8@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <20130701181749.GA3831@kroah.com> <20130701205615.18fdcea2@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: ce0b27e0-a978-4c33-b933-6bfd81df97da X-Archives-Hash: fe5c62b83a1ba9d098464c8a2d3a3197 On 07/01/2013 04:25 PM, Fabio Erculiani wrote: > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:14 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: > [...] > >> It's really scary to have the BFQ in a stable gentoo-sources ebuild. > BFQ is not that scary, it's "just" an iosched (and it's quite easy to > write an iosched), what could possibly go wrong? > Jokes apart, I've been using it in production for almost 2 years now > (can't remember exactly). I'm pretty sure I hit a genuine deadlock with it. I've been trying to reproduce with debugging on but nothing yet. But, having said that: BFQ [Experimtental] This introduced an experimental io scheduler. Have fun with it, but don't dare use it in production else we will laugh. > >> -- >> Regards, >> Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer >> http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang >> > > -- Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] E-Mail : blueness@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA