From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5375D1381F3 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 18:33:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 41DB0E08E1; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 18:33:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 548AEE08CA for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 18:33:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.26.7] (ip98-164-195-43.oc.oc.cox.net [98.164.195.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zmedico) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7B8F733E312 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 18:33:23 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <51C9E271.5010806@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:33:21 -0700 From: Zac Medico User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman default References: <20130625104710.7158f5a1@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20130625104710.7158f5a1@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 2ef33880-eb5a-4494-aeee-8441e165a6cf X-Archives-Hash: cb83541786b3ee34be313322e4e1c3fa On 06/25/2013 07:47 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 01:40:38 -0400 > Michael Sterrett wrote: > >> repoman should default to the -I behavior: discuss. > > > wont this disable important regular checks also? The -I (--ignore-masked) option only disables dependency checks for masked "parent" packages. > foo is masked by package.mask, bar depends on foo. repoman -I wont > catch a broken dep in bar. No, we don't currently have an option like that, and I don't think we want one like that. > IMHO it should do the -I check in addition to the current ones and print > warnings/errors. The -I option only disables checks that are normally enabled. -- Thanks, Zac