From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DF2B1381F3 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:11:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0803DE09C9; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:11:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D5E0E08EA for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:11:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.160] (CPE002401f30b73-CM001cea3ddad8.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.224.181.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: axs) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2895033E3EE for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:11:37 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <51C861AE.7040006@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 11:11:42 -0400 From: Ian Stakenvicius User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130523 Thunderbird/17.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last time touched bugs by year References: <2721009.MOcim2sagC@arcarius> <201306212108.45890.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <51C4A805.3000209@gentoo.org> <51C4A921.1000001@gentoo.org> <51C4AF4F.506@yahoo.ca> In-Reply-To: <51C4AF4F.506@yahoo.ca> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6a1pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 69f553ba-aef0-454b-baa9-37e6f297b455 X-Archives-Hash: 6cd72b769f1816e08fe11365f2ad2de6 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 21/06/13 03:53 PM, Alex Xu wrote: > On 21/06/13 03:27 PM, Sergey Popov wrote: >> 21.06.2013 23:22, Sergey Popov пишет: >>> 2) package has dead upstream, does not build with current >>> gcc/glibc/binutils/whatever and can not be fixed - bug is >>> closed as OBSOLETE. >>> >> >> Of course i am talking about long-standing bugs, that assigned >> to maintainer-wanted@. That's why OBSOLETE seems to be a better >> decision, but WONTFIX is reasonable too :-) >> > nobody needs it: OBSOLETE it doesn't work: CANTFIX > For many m-w bugs, its existence in overlays like sunrise still apply here to whether or not the bug should be left active and valid, tho. I think it might still be beneficial to filter out the m-w bugs that are tagged with InOverlay -- or at least, not expect them to be resolved or closed unless the sunrise dev's take care of this when they drop the package. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlHIYa4ACgkQ2ugaI38ACPADuQD/RSPQY3rmzp9tjVURHZFNgsut 04MIae+7g/S9AcG64e8BAKmqmIBHeJv0+qDDfs5gZA9xoEJBiRmxDaFrdLnmBDZS =Yyyi -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----