On 6/20/13 2:16 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Doing test signatures won't cover all failures.

Do you know an example? The only one I'm aware of is when a test
signature is made very close to the expiration date, and then the real
signature would be done after it.

> IMHO the best thing to do would be to drop CVS keywords and let repoman
> do normal commits instead of this two-step thing. But some of the devs
> really prefer to keep them, at least until we migrate to git and have
> better ways of e.g. checking the file version.

Right, I found that it's used at least for prefix.

I'm fine with waiting until git migration - looks like that would solve
it naturally.

Paweł