From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 182D31381F3 for ; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 11:57:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E9393E0B73; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 11:57:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AAA8E0B3F for ; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 11:57:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.4.5] (blfd-4d082218.pool.mediaWays.net [77.8.34.24]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hasufell) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D9E5833E674 for ; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 11:57:25 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <51C59122.7020506@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 13:57:22 +0200 From: hasufell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130606 Thunderbird/17.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] eselect init References: <51A08A68.3020900@gentoo.org> <20130620205609.GB23719@linux1> <20130621043959.7eae0921@gentoo.org> <20130621041600.GA24770@linux1> <20130621122328.662eddc0@gentoo.org> <20130621151610.GA26281@linux1> <20130621164227.GA26775@linux1> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6a1pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: c9ecb5df-fd17-4f95-a521-fa7654a56cd5 X-Archives-Hash: 7ef91cb449b2811d14f4e38ce957073b On 06/22/2013 01:23 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > and nobody is forced to install eselect-init That was already demanded earlier in this discussion, but I don't see any response from the initiators of this idea (possible I just missed it). Anyway... if they do such a global change without discussing this particular problem, then it will cause someone to revert it or ask for QA/council intervention.