From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27F081381F3 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:50:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A5C4AE0A5A; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:50:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFAEFE0A40 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:49:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.95] (dynamic-adsl-84-220-166-175.clienti.tiscali.it [84.220.166.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lu_zero) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4656633E5B9 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:49:58 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <51C43DEA.6000006@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 13:50:02 +0200 From: Luca Barbato User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130411 Thunderbird/17.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] eselect init References: <51A08A68.3020900@gentoo.org> <20130620205609.GB23719@linux1> <20130621043959.7eae0921@gentoo.org> <51C42B33.9090709@gentoo.org> <1371814006.2486.10.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1371814006.2486.10.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 23f60392-f17f-4b02-b297-36c35f1b5d4b X-Archives-Hash: 7691b7a5e7a22756384e6420f05e6b1a On 06/21/2013 01:26 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > Thanks for the explanation. But I think that, currently, the only > remaining "objection" is whether play with /sbin/init (that needs > sysvinit to be changed if I don't misremember) or with /sbin/einit. > Looks like mgorny has shown some problems on relying on "einit" instead > of plain "init" regarding to fallback :/ I prefer having /sbin/init used for the pivot since /sbin/einit is a bit more brittle and as Fabio did the whole machinery is _still_ opt-in. lu