From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-60938-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D8631381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:04:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D505E0968;
	Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:04:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com (mail-wi0-f169.google.com [209.85.212.169])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37A2EE0954
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:04:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wi0-f169.google.com with SMTP id c10so181766wiw.2
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 19:04:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
         :references:in-reply-to:content-type;
        bh=YxEB2mCsWf5dl5tpnPqYa4uzIDrxAB0D6azrUTIv7eE=;
        b=if4fkwsUWzrxxmeenNFYiii4oy/TzolYXuCy4br2Lgjkzx4dJuKnDGXFfmcL+dompZ
         vwZlre+2GI/k3HFTPQPjxQ/OvYJU1Ct4BfkZvsuQ68O4rbovlR+k3RT3gHu7OKjpoPJG
         DttR6LUSRBCPzSiidD/EMTbjpH6Wm3qBvlr8/Ei2auCh9c5RdFbXZ5klhu1hMuggqZPp
         r8KRroY25wxCyAL60bya0RhTkrmY9IuKo0ok4nBh3vvWPOFjyWmVFbRbfV+kG4g6dqiz
         IAeko83f8Ht8ZzIU1t5b0Vcy5E8UsFhvNDzckYUePXjuw2J+BL1e2lNRsjQ1KtzCZv8b
         Gmdw==
X-Received: by 10.180.81.169 with SMTP id b9mr9253805wiy.40.1371607474826;
        Tue, 18 Jun 2013 19:04:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.4.18] ([5.157.117.94])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id k10sm5939086wia.4.2013.06.18.19.04.32
        for <multiple recipients>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Tue, 18 Jun 2013 19:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <51C110E7.705@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:01:11 +0200
From: "vivo75@gmail.com" <vivo75@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130610 Thunderbird/17.0.6
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
CC: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Calling die in a subshell
References: <51BC9105.5070604@gentoo.org> <20924.37728.751450.362549@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20130615182413.2e1b2f8a@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <20130615174230.33a7592c@googlemail.com> <CAJ0EP42rN1TSXD2YJG07u3j4ZsW86X6LioZemXRKZs1G9jmfig@mail.gmail.com> <20130615180129.72c2ca8b@googlemail.com> <CAJ0EP41wQ80vqH6S7hBFZjueFMQFCa6cCyQv0edk35B6G-h3mA@mail.gmail.com> <51BF6D40.4040102@gmail.com> <51BF763C.60703@gentoo.org> <pan$192a3$d8a61b79$c5324be$b9cf2034@cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <pan$192a3$d8a61b79$c5324be$b9cf2034@cox.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------010704020503060408040506"
X-Archives-Salt: 21659a5f-004a-48c3-9c51-76a214ba2ed7
X-Archives-Hash: 6c1483ef048823571ae87d84e420cafc

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------010704020503060408040506
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 06/18/13 09:06, Duncan wrote:
>> > What on earth is a "teoric fallacy"?
> My question too.  Wictionary and google both appear to agree, however, 
> that while "teoric" isn't English, it's Catalan (or Aranese/Occitan, the 
> area is NE Spain into south France) for "theoretical", which it /is/ 
> close enough sounding/spelling to, to make sense as having the same 
> original root (which wikipedia traces to late Latin from ancient Greek).
>
> http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/te%C3%B2ric
near enough, it was an (unwanted) chimera between Italian and English

--------------010704020503060408040506
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 06/18/13 09:06, Duncan wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote cite="mid:pan$192a3$d8a61b79$c5324be$b9cf2034@cox.net"
      type="cite">
      <blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">
        <pre wrap=""><span class="moz-txt-citetags">&gt; </span>What on earth is a "teoric fallacy"?
</pre>
      </blockquote>
      <pre wrap="">My question too.  Wictionary and google both appear to agree, however, 
that while "teoric" isn't English, it's Catalan (or Aranese/Occitan, the 
area is NE Spain into south France) for "theoretical", which it <i class="moz-txt-slash"><span class="moz-txt-tag">/</span>is<span class="moz-txt-tag">/</span></i> 
close enough sounding/spelling to, to make sense as having the same 
original root (which wikipedia traces to late Latin from ancient Greek).

<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/te%C3%B2ric">http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/te%C3%B2ric</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    near enough, it was an (unwanted) chimera between Italian and
    English<br>
  </body>
</html>

--------------010704020503060408040506--