From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-60831-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C8771381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 16:58:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F0CCEE0975;
	Sat, 15 Jun 2013 16:58:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00186E094C
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 16:58:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.4.5] (blfd-4d08fdce.pool.mediaWays.net [77.8.253.206])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: hasufell)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7AFE133DC38
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 16:58:04 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <51BC9D1A.5070906@gentoo.org>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 18:58:02 +0200
From: hasufell <hasufell@gentoo.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130606 Thunderbird/17.0.6
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Calling die in a subshell
References: <51BC9105.5070604@gentoo.org> <20924.37728.751450.362549@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20130615182413.2e1b2f8a@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <20130615174230.33a7592c@googlemail.com> <CAJ0EP42rN1TSXD2YJG07u3j4ZsW86X6LioZemXRKZs1G9jmfig@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ0EP42rN1TSXD2YJG07u3j4ZsW86X6LioZemXRKZs1G9jmfig@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6a1pre
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 21c5ca76-9567-4598-9d33-1b22bdc2048b
X-Archives-Hash: 593a837ac858c386db2b993826793278

On 06/15/2013 06:56 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> 
> If we find that all known implementations of PMS/EAPI 4 have
> implemented a certain behavior, making a change to that version of PMS
> to properly document the behavior seems reasonable.
> 

Right, that's why my quote from the council log does not make sense.