From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EEAC1381F3 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 16:45:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F19FE097A; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 16:45:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFA3CE094C for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 16:45:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.4.5] (blfd-4d08fdce.pool.mediaWays.net [77.8.253.206]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hasufell) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7231E33DD01 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 16:45:07 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <51BC9A11.2030804@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 18:45:05 +0200 From: hasufell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130606 Thunderbird/17.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Calling die in a subshell References: <51BC9105.5070604@gentoo.org> <20924.37728.751450.362549@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20130615182413.2e1b2f8a@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <51BC992E.4020504@gentoo.org> <20130615174338.3e2a985c@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <20130615174338.3e2a985c@googlemail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6a1pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 6e3af230-335a-493a-81cb-d40c80a6e6bb X-Archives-Hash: 6bc4b3bf17531646fc7a5cf4c1a12bf8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/15/2013 06:43 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 18:41:18 +0200 hasufell > wrote: >> On 06/15/2013 06:24 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote: >>> Why not fix the specs? > >> from council log >> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20120911.txt > >> Okay for EAPI 5. *Nothing* gets applied >> retroactively. *EVER* > >> So that means some people think it doesn't even matter what the >> issue is. We never fix the spec, we just enhance it. > >> Oh, you asked for reasoning... > > If you want the reasoning for that decision, you should look at > the entire log, and not just one line of it. > > I was not talking about that decision. Stop derailing threads on -dev. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRvJoRAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzSE4H/iFVg/nfbMczic8xj7h/46A5 noMJ29KdJYaT9CKan9gD3vEpH8GuPwaZYSXIrfagPI3FV7ovJS6+hluGuTuzoaiQ FL9Zh3aam4mO6P5ds7yKz53Her5uM6N/wf58/81EFy4bVtNebWDbYmD8xvC/oe7i U6k4gH/PWxSd8HJCngA5lRk4/xLPeR5YKfWsvOOiQEJ+908s8Vw7nEtGIvlXKRjN +ujTlxW182jauWlV0S92KgNdsMqWk8OctJnWT2G02PqqQ6DzXkxUeKbakN9STbVM SVVbWJLTTKvQ+lfYGcIJroaA7RhR0GQqQ6HvebfIrgQiTY6kfzHpQqElA9iH6qs= =2cmH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----