From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73E851381F3 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 16:41:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 80228E097A; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 16:41:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9955CE094C for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 16:41:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.4.5] (blfd-4d08fdce.pool.mediaWays.net [77.8.253.206]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hasufell) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7260F33E4BC for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 16:41:20 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <51BC992E.4020504@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 18:41:18 +0200 From: hasufell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130606 Thunderbird/17.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Calling die in a subshell References: <51BC9105.5070604@gentoo.org> <20924.37728.751450.362549@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20130615182413.2e1b2f8a@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> In-Reply-To: <20130615182413.2e1b2f8a@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6a1pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 1dbd0ca0-6544-4fbd-985f-ea31208a342b X-Archives-Hash: a38ffc2939cfd65accb64a3c015e4d1f -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/15/2013 06:24 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote: > > Why not fix the specs? > from council log http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20120911.txt Okay for EAPI 5. *Nothing* gets applied retroactively. *EVER* So that means some people think it doesn't even matter what the issue is. We never fix the spec, we just enhance it. Oh, you asked for reasoning... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRvJkuAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWz3tQH/2obXhpX8yDpmJJdzu5xdEOK I5K+RM8FJoqdNwTe/V1DPvr/aNfr8dUBCisge6mjJ999pb1jVG3FhTNIwFBOI2UE HZeMdnUtvSv3ind6FyL4bpRYGLbk9iTHEvOrZd0P92cEhtawyLwjDx4r2Ux+0ucM y5UaLXQlFw9tu8bW/eyouY7an0hg6CzMbGzImjAWGgb6O/PtTzcm0UWPZrNiQWZ7 jORvS1m/MHrJLM3EGabUsgp+ak6QOEeVKILC2YNe3XjWWhMlLNKt14BWLiWngkog LUnVDJ7eDyJjbMAcAqAW48rHE0dxUVgexQC7bMd5pLSRTuucOQGQmf9mrFoiVeo= =gerD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----