From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96E4E1381F3 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 15:43:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 03D33E0997; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 15:43:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 149D2E0984 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 15:43:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.27] (unknown [78.193.54.97]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lu_zero) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CF59C33E317 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 15:43:25 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <51BC8B9B.9020301@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 17:43:23 +0200 From: Luca Barbato User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130411 Thunderbird/17.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] SRC_URI behaviour References: <51BC2C55.7010506@mva.name> <20130615150549.5faa3829@gentoo.org> <1371309858.28535.30.camel@big_daddy.dol-sen.ca> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 3881614e-bf98-413d-9b98-82809f19ec89 X-Archives-Hash: f8ec7ab69505f24dac3379a9692ffaac On 06/15/2013 05:33 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote: >> The other thing is that would put a mandatory system requirement on >> layman which many of the devs would be opposed to. But, there is an open >> bug calling for it to be merged with portage... > > Honestly, native support for overlays is something paludis gets right > - the main tree is just another tree and you prioritize them. Not sure it is a great idea in practice. lu