From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DED01381F3 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 13:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BA2A5E09CD; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 13:50:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE34EE09A2 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 13:50:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.27] (unknown [78.193.54.97]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lu_zero) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9593633DDD8 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 13:50:26 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <51BC7120.9070301@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 15:50:24 +0200 From: Luca Barbato User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130411 Thunderbird/17.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] SRC_URI behaviour References: <51BC2C55.7010506@mva.name> <51BC5F3E.5050104@mva.name> In-Reply-To: <51BC5F3E.5050104@mva.name> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 8bc5b02e-30d4-478b-bfc4-912b9fa18a13 X-Archives-Hash: a01b2a50f2a1d32a3b8e0c6ec07ae919 On 06/15/2013 02:34 PM, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote: > 15.06.2013 18:50, Diego Elio Pettenò пишет: >> Over my dead CVS access. > Any reasonable/argumented objection? to put in different words: We do not want to use untraceable/transient/ephemeral sources for main ebuilds, live ebuilds are corner cases. Ruby related stuff had it worst regarding mis-packaging and total reliance on git with horrid stories they might tell you later over a large coffee. > And, anyway, quoted part is optional behaviour that should just make > ebuild-writing easy. > Mandatory part is to be able to have restrict://foo.bar and downloadable > things at the same time. In fact the restrict part got some proposals and not a terse and stern reject. lu