From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B862D1381F3 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 13:16:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C4B5FE09F4; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 13:16:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f54.google.com (mail-wg0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1CC3E09CB for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 13:16:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id n11so1263605wgh.9 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 06:16:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=41+a05MyeEvWSSoRV1xKdBWJ6Jtg59otGbVdgkV11qs=; b=FSELa6oL09rN7pAh7vTik6DJb0oUNKCaIutIz0LGIDMPsKfYWLb90+nUc15nAKyq1P 9fY6puDXVDxh+szX9fR6xTTRaj6F+rWk31/PDiTlNrHTbCWz6lA1ut3Y6csoD7G1vAsH PlCROJl+AOHnMTst8LTmx9x0SvoUBx9H9R1fX7vwv2avNkglDi6Ka/yuN647VaMxzNvG WxoFsL2eJMOVPO8d28ujuM262Ejl5STHetXFIWujEzyRQ8h1uJuvlIVv//t/woE9VIG0 teDqqqy/M96in2Vw8t9dgHpEWjRzksxttP0ZAhrCARnKfs2uDHrZjzYx8vplHH8UMKCE u+HQ== X-Received: by 10.194.93.201 with SMTP id cw9mr4002259wjb.68.1371302205455; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 06:16:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from saladin.home.flameeyes.eu ([46.7.0.33]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id f8sm9060763wiv.0.2013.06.15.06.16.43 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 15 Jun 2013 06:16:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51BC6933.5060109@flameeyes.eu> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 14:16:35 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?RGllZ28gRWxpbyBQZXR0ZW7Dsg==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130610 Thunderbird/17.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] SRC_URI behaviour References: <51BC2C55.7010506@mva.name> <20130615150549.5faa3829@gentoo.org> <51BC67FD.2070308@mva.name> In-Reply-To: <51BC67FD.2070308@mva.name> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6a1pre Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="----enig2WPHSREVILUFAKRRGPOBD" X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmhbHO5Ql8ntpLqAGoTzHe1CoawLUU+6MMIvk7V+vASd9HDNvrB8W/0fKrELxVe3sOLYqH1 X-Archives-Salt: d0ddc273-42d5-4fb9-a6dc-08d1d01f96da X-Archives-Hash: dc1bd5b9bd676dbb408c68838126490e This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) ------enig2WPHSREVILUFAKRRGPOBD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 15/06/2013 14:11, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote: > And I suggest you all (including Diego) to discuss about that, instead > of oppositing vcs-related SRC_URI ;) Then next time don't collapse two widely different proposals, especially considering that one of the two has been already discussed to death. --=20 Diego Elio Petten=C3=B2 =E2=80=94 Flameeyes flameeyes@flameeyes.eu =E2=80=94 http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ ------enig2WPHSREVILUFAKRRGPOBD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRvGk3AAoJEBqCrVe7WSRDecUH/3FTZ1fgwEJHVNYHPmS0Jkgu cQ1+q9VkKW5Eukaph6R+cxwMW8aVvpKFli0sdnCcDH325c/Q8Ux9V4lyMW+hd1d+ ciEdIMElady2WMPk0quQ/8U5xJVozXHhEOv9ViwI4uSReBGcbu99icQXmU/pBoPX A6LLeOTSs2EKIK7dDQTalKQbgkVdWhbNcyRY+q9jCrc8TBQ8tbSY5RKt07VMgaOH iqIamoQlDaj30a/OkmAe9V6w631FM7sNrHlZ5E/9aV6VSzaMGaKUv/2K7mk1zD2d cLwhJUNmA6uxt2O2/Dhy8rVlSGZQ4hvZ+Kl/ADgo8wxGeh+hT8riPupU2t49x04= =iaKH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------enig2WPHSREVILUFAKRRGPOBD--