From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81BF51381F3 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 06:27:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3A9D9E085B; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 06:26:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 431A0E084C for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 06:26:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.172.7.150] (85-76-34-13-nat.elisa-mobile.fi [85.76.34.13]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ssuominen) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 89F5A33E406; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 06:26:49 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <51B9657D.3000308@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 09:23:57 +0300 From: Samuli Suominen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130605 Thunderbird/17.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= CC: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: =?UTF-8?B?W3BhdGNoXcKgIGJhc2gtY29tcGxldGlv?= =?UTF-8?B?bi1yMS5lY2xhc3M6IGFkZCBzdXBwb3J0IGZvciBwa2ctY29uZmlnIGZvciBtaWc=?= =?UTF-8?B?cmF0aW9uIHRvIHRoZSBuZXcgdXBzdHJlYW0gZGVmaW5lZCBiYXNoLWNvbXBsZXQ=?= =?UTF-8?B?aW9uIGRpcmVjdG9yaWVzIChwcmVyZXEgZm9yIGJ1ZyA0NzI5Mzgp?= References: <51B8F493.3000003@gentoo.org> <20130613065835.3a406829@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20130613065835.3a406829@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: eef266c8-1cdf-4036-838d-704aefaa055a X-Archives-Hash: 6aa1dfcab7498695ec97f640638349b5 On 13/06/13 07:58, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2013-06-13, o godz. 01:22:11 > Samuli Suominen napisał(a): > >> what $subject says, >> >> "add support for pkg-config for migration to the new upstream defined >> bash-completion directories (prereq for bug 472938)" >> >> http://bugs.gentoo.org/472938 >> >> ie. the pkg-config file shipped *now* in portage is a hack from me to >> postpone this >> >> pretty tired so more eyes is cool ;) > > You mean http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/85258 ? > > I think you've got to convince ulm in the first place. > His concerns was actually already covered by the first post and the linked bug: This is required for smooth migration path from old to new directories. Back when the old thread happened, there was only one possible value for completions dir, now there is two. And nothing prevents upstream adding/changing the values in the .pc file yet again for next release, this should be dynamic -- just like $(get_udevdir), $(get_libdir) etc.