From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E0231381F3 for ; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 17:20:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E744AE096E; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 17:20:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11086E07F1 for ; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 17:19:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.4.5] (blfd-4d083315.pool.mediaWays.net [77.8.51.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hasufell) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C73DE33E20B for ; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 17:19:58 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <51B8ADBC.6080308@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 19:19:56 +0200 From: hasufell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130606 Thunderbird/17.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Over-reliance of Gentoo projects on overlays References: <20130612185126.15f142b0@gentoo.org> <51B8A904.6060406@gentoo.org> <20130612180255.59f313b3@googlemail.com> <51B8AA59.8010603@gentoo.org> <20130612181312.774d0bd1@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <20130612181312.774d0bd1@googlemail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6a1pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 6a6e6935-a03b-4314-9b9f-47e75f226695 X-Archives-Hash: 92ba42eee2041c7a6d35d72be4303d81 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/12/2013 07:13 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 19:05:29 +0200 hasufell > wrote: >>> Isn't it more an indication that Gentoo needs better package >>> management support for overlays? > >> No. > > You make a persuasive argument. I realise now that the Summer of > Code projects for this were a mistake. > > Your conclusion is not related to my answer. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRuK27AAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzTEoH/RRYSfZqrwE0YdbvoFi8Df/x yN+XUn95Dt9k08XGa6uhSdKc0U+hxjuP7JRE6C1lfV3M+sgegA5l+mEZSo0WeZmO xjMGykbLEIxAmUGmRTu1Hroy7R9RoRQKKF9aQ6VlwjmcbsxhVYpNJis/UY4sHrxe 7yygdcgpzMkT3rCZDdLyxUS5RCfOevVftImkmD/RlXayjHvqJDx8yisCxd4Ws2ll VR+xaTOe5UlTAxKj1t0qtIhd332tFsVY2+5XUtTkv3Ay0E6fd7t9GNvh+lUvoZfJ 0KT7Zz3dsuduerIoWBBy60c3G4A4mITlFwiOou4oEgE44L0Z/LBZheJGL6SFes4= =ASxW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----