public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ultrabug <ultrabug@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving project pages to wiki.gentoo.org
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 22:38:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51B6393B.6020103@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51B5ED79.6060007@gentoo.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2039 bytes --]

On 10/06/2013 17:15, Alex Legler wrote:
> On 10.06.2013 14:36, Sergey Popov wrote:
>> 09.06.2013 18:22, Alex Legler пишет:
>>> I'd appreciate some input on below plan to move project pages to the Wiki:
>>>
>>> Motivation
>>> ----------
>>>
>>> The main motivation is to reduce the contents on the main website,
>>> allowing for an easier makeover. Also, the Wiki exposes the contents and
>>> an editing capability to more people, allowing for better collaboration.
>>> Finally, this is an opportunity for projects to go through the contents
>>> in their project spaces and update/remove outdated contents as well
>>> Gentoo as a whole to remove orphaned projects.
>> Err, i do not want to say that wiki is not suite for this purpose, but
>> what's wrong with current situation? Is there something wrong with gorg?
> The software is unmaintained, and the website template is next to
> unmaintainable. I could go on a bit more about this, but I think these
> two points *alone* justify moving away from it.
>
>> Well, it is not always clear how to use some of it's features, but apart
>> of that, why we should migrate to wiki?
>>
>> Just to clear orphaned project pages?
> No, I described multiple points. Again:
>   - Less contents on www.g.o -> we can much more easily relaunch it
>   - Users can more easily contribute to project documentation
>   - Update/purge project documentation
>   - Remove orphaned projects
>
>> Why we can not just have official project pages, maintained as usual
>> through gorg and additional info in wiki(if it is needed, for example,
>> like we do on Gentoo Qt project page?
>>
> In case it wasn't clear enough yet: This is step 1 of n to get rid of
> gorg and GuideXML for the website (read: not main docs) aspects of Gentoo.
> Running two project page venues increases maintenance instead of
> lowering it. I intend to have less work after this change, not more.
>
> Do you have any concerns beyond 'never change a running system'?
+1, totally agree.. It's 2013 duh..

-- 
Ultrabug
Gentoo / cluster


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2823 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-06-10 20:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-09 14:22 [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving project pages to wiki.gentoo.org Alex Legler
2013-06-09 15:44 ` Ulrich Mueller
2013-06-09 16:01   ` Alex Legler
2013-06-09 15:57 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2013-06-09 16:03   ` Alex Legler
2013-06-10  6:48 ` Dirkjan Ochtman
2013-06-10 12:36 ` Sergey Popov
2013-06-10 13:29   ` Diego Elio Pettenò
2013-06-10 14:31   ` Michał Górny
2013-06-10 15:15   ` Alex Legler
2013-06-10 15:47     ` Hans de Graaff
2013-06-10 20:38     ` Ultrabug [this message]
2013-06-11 10:49     ` Sergey Popov
2013-06-10 23:06 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2013-06-11 10:20   ` Sven Vermeulen
2013-06-11 11:05     ` Theo Chatzimichos
2013-06-11 12:15       ` Alex Legler
2013-06-13 16:33         ` Sven Vermeulen
2013-06-16  0:28           ` [gentoo-dev] [1/3] Automatic *XML->Wiki wiki.gentoo.org Robin H. Johnson
2013-06-26 13:54             ` Alex Legler
2013-07-08 20:02               ` Sven Vermeulen
2013-07-09 15:46                 ` [gentoo-dev] " Steven J. Long
     [not found]                 ` <51DB41CA.8090707@yahoo.ca>
2013-07-09 23:53                   ` [gentoo-dev] " Alex Xu
2013-07-10  0:29                     ` Alex Legler
2013-07-10  0:45                       ` Alex Xu
2013-07-10  6:58                         ` Tom Wijsman
2013-07-10  9:10                           ` Michael Weber
2013-07-10  9:26                             ` Tom Wijsman
2013-07-10  8:23                       ` Sven Vermeulen
2013-06-16  1:21 ` [gentoo-dev] [2&3]/3 API & files Robin H. Johnson
2013-06-16 12:08   ` Alex Legler
2013-06-16 19:44     ` Robin H. Johnson
2013-06-16 22:12       ` Alex Legler
2013-06-16 22:56       ` Alex Xu
2013-06-18 18:06     ` Robin H. Johnson
2013-06-22  9:20   ` Markos Chandras
2013-06-22 10:14     ` Alex Legler
2013-06-16  4:01 ` [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving project pages to wiki.gentoo.org "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2013-06-16  9:01   ` Tom Wijsman
2013-06-16 10:53   ` Alex Legler
2013-06-16 19:40     ` Robin H. Johnson
2013-06-16 20:12   ` Kent Fredric
2013-06-16 20:36     ` Andreas K. Huettel
2013-06-16 23:17       ` Alex Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51B6393B.6020103@gentoo.org \
    --to=ultrabug@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox