From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F6551381F3 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 12:37:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E6045E086D; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 12:36:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9BFFE0804 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 12:36:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (unknown [80.80.98.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pinkbyte) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6685333DFE1 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 12:36:49 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <51B5C85B.3050500@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 16:36:43 +0400 From: Sergey Popov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130208 Thunderbird/17.0.2 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving project pages to wiki.gentoo.org References: <51B48FA1.9080403@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <51B48FA1.9080403@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="----enig2QRVJMWRGEHMTXQTUHMBT" X-Archives-Salt: 52a59b65-1f62-4ca1-b15d-ca519e3bb313 X-Archives-Hash: 0812ab0053ac31b50b79fef0d8188a83 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) ------enig2QRVJMWRGEHMTXQTUHMBT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 09.06.2013 18:22, Alex Legler =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > I'd appreciate some input on below plan to move project pages to the Wi= ki: >=20 > Motivation > ---------- >=20 > The main motivation is to reduce the contents on the main website, > allowing for an easier makeover. Also, the Wiki exposes the contents an= d > an editing capability to more people, allowing for better collaboration= =2E > Finally, this is an opportunity for projects to go through the contents= > in their project spaces and update/remove outdated contents as well > Gentoo as a whole to remove orphaned projects. Err, i do not want to say that wiki is not suite for this purpose, but what's wrong with current situation? Is there something wrong with gorg? Well, it is not always clear how to use some of it's features, but apart of that, why we should migrate to wiki? Just to clear orphaned project pages? Why we can not just have official project pages, maintained as usual through gorg and additional info in wiki(if it is needed, for example, like we do on Gentoo Qt project page? --=20 Best regards, Sergey Popov Gentoo developer Gentoo Desktop-effects project lead Gentoo Qt project lead ------enig2QRVJMWRGEHMTXQTUHMBT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRtchcAAoJECo/aRed9267h6QIALJg/j/kLUAnU+o+IlZDSE/j 3jAbTDwfmN9W9O+7+irDQ9Wp2o0h+CfZ10EUr50zWO1ABtxCqiHiWRJNnafMpJyn XW2HY2rqHJtXd42WfKuUwlbuKyE/dwm2Wj9hUdJZ6CJdhJcJpvm7f8QJZbp0AZ0i 1kOMF8bed4dTLv/YaqBWOee5ytEyfRfkRv2d8qKNyEfQHOqI+K8QWLIb1JA33FUa Y9M7RoQkAojwWyiSVeLvtIhskKXO7drcyLNPrkMCGKVYjivNcckZArYT+Os5Yd6p pG94kAFxvn+TEfzBBUYvkZelO1xW0+Geb16Q3EuK3zfLNGlNWFf6+yQbC/xbCyQ= =7BeO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------enig2QRVJMWRGEHMTXQTUHMBT--