From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87BCF1381F3 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 11:07:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 42498E0973; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 11:07:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 405AEE087D for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 11:07:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.26.5] (ip98-164-195-43.oc.oc.cox.net [98.164.195.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zmedico) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6C13F33E23A for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 11:07:14 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <51ADCA61.9070402@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 04:07:13 -0700 From: Zac Medico User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Draft news item: preserve-libs default for portage-2.1.12 References: <51ABE631.8040207@gentoo.org> <20130603123254.266747c3@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <51AD33A3.40400@gentoo.org> <1370328569.27731.2.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1370328569.27731.2.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 76166bba-3284-4e82-94f5-bdc64b0274fb X-Archives-Hash: b93d1188261ede66d5772306d78677b4 On 06/03/2013 11:49 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El lun, 03-06-2013 a las 17:24 -0700, Zac Medico escribió: > [...] >> Yeah. The news item now advises the user that it's a good practice to >> run revdep-rebuild anyway, just to be safe. > > I would also suggest people to report bugs when they find cases not > catched by preserve-libs as they can be a real bug (like bug #460826) Well, I already gave them an example bug report, so hopefully they'll take that as a clue. I don't feel like nagging them to file bugs. -- Thanks, Zac