From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BA471381F3 for ; Tue, 28 May 2013 12:15:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 323D5E09CD; Tue, 28 May 2013 12:15:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F078BE09B9 for ; Tue, 28 May 2013 12:15:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.160] (bas1-ottawa09-2925287262.dsl.bell.ca [174.92.87.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: axs) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C738233E0DB for ; Tue, 28 May 2013 12:15:17 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <51A49FD9.5000502@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 08:15:21 -0400 From: Ian Stakenvicius User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130523 Thunderbird/17.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] eselect init References: <51A08A68.3020900@gentoo.org> <20130526084332.1a8afa69@gentoo.org> <51A1DC0C.2070706@gentoo.org> <20130526125742.4584d094@gentoo.org> <51A1F493.90101@gentoo.org> <51A22310.70202@gentoo.org> <51A42ABB.7090408@gentoo.org> <20130528061933.325d7d0f@gentoo.org> <51A4360D.7040204@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <51A4360D.7040204@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6a1pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 54527d47-0b12-4c96-8764-c24e942d4dea X-Archives-Hash: 2bf4d642913772d1e0e688d73e23a6ed -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 28/05/13 12:43 AM, Luca Barbato wrote: OK -- so, given how very simple this wrapper is, and likewise how simple the switcher script would probably be to write, what's the goal of this whole thread, exactly? It doesn't sound like this is something complicated that we'd need to actually provide via an ebuild or integrating patches in other init-system ebuilds anymore... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlGkn9QACgkQ2ugaI38ACPDo5gD/aObV6+JWdkb+qK4jR0ukh1p5 M3ITzlLVjayvAV6pixwA/2KdUeXK1xcHESVfXLcD1b7+iE75+SOKsQBZz/9S78lO =4NET -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----