From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0505D1381F3 for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 12:24:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F3C02E0D0A; Sun, 26 May 2013 12:24:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14544E0B72 for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 12:24:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Nyx.local (dynamic-adsl-84-220-77-8.clienti.tiscali.it [84.220.77.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lu_zero) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A810933DF46; Sun, 26 May 2013 12:24:04 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <51A1FEE2.4030602@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 14:24:02 +0200 From: Luca Barbato User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:22.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/22.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_G=F3rny?= , gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] eselect init References: <51A08A68.3020900@gentoo.org> <20130526084332.1a8afa69@gentoo.org> <51A1DC0C.2070706@gentoo.org> <20130526125742.4584d094@gentoo.org> <51A1F493.90101@gentoo.org> <20130526140834.0e19ede5@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20130526140834.0e19ede5@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: ac89ced0-a2f8-45df-a06a-74f4ea828e03 X-Archives-Hash: 202c87b63452f888ab97996a2de0ce8f On 5/26/13 2:08 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > You could've asked me that when I was still using OpenRC. I don't > really want to grep the 40 scripts right now, and I don't think I have > the worse cases installed here. Worth investigation, not by you, but those that loathe systemd should have a look and see if they could fix some. >> For your needs probably just pivoting a symlink should work almost fine, >> as long your stay sysvinit compatible, yet doing that as early init or >> as post kill-all should work better even in your case. > > Well, you're transforming a simple idea with potentially relatively > wide audience into a horror story with a single user. Hopefully not =) I just stated what's the problem and the possible solutions. As said from start I want the whole thing to be an opt-in and to cause the least amount of disruption on current setups. Patching sysvinit and bb-init to accept a "-c " would make the whole thing much simpler if we pick a wrapper solution for my most complex case. lu