From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1130B1381F3 for ; Sat, 25 May 2013 21:55:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E5D62E0C73; Sat, 25 May 2013 21:55:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0BD8E0C64 for ; Sat, 25 May 2013 21:55:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.3.7] (cpe-69-207-16-110.buffalo.res.rr.com [69.207.16.110]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: blueness) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0FAD433BF0D for ; Sat, 25 May 2013 21:55:53 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <51A13369.6080504@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 17:55:53 -0400 From: "Anthony G. Basile" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130518 Thunderbird/17.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Going against co-maintainer's wishes (ref. bug 412697) References: <51A0FF5E.5070304@gentoo.org> <51A116B1.8010902@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: abd57206-7ca5-449b-a941-b9194175e21f X-Archives-Hash: a44b5a18c7e4ea46188893655c77d10d On 05/25/2013 03:58 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: >> Can I ask the systemd people to design a working solution for opting out? I >> can't support this initiative without such a solution and I would be happy >> to work with the systemd people to reach it, ie I'll test. >> > What about INSTALL_MASK does not work? > > I put the responsibility for designing a more idiot-proof opt-out > system in the hands of those that actually care about it. Most of us > are on systems with plenty of storage, and those who are not (embedded > devs) should be perfectly capable of setting INSTALL_MASK without > hosing their systems. > Maybe it is sufficient. I seem to recall someone saying (either on the list or IRC) that it needed some work. If its good enough, then problem solved. -- Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] E-Mail : blueness@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA