Re: [gentoo-dev] robo-stable bugs

[Michael Mol <mikemol@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 979 bytes --]

On 05/22/2013 08:53 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 21/05/13 07:43 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
> > [ Snip reasons for why opt-out is bad ]
>
> So why don't we add something to package metadata, to indicate that a
> package is OK to be considered for auto-stabilization??  It lets
> everyone opt-in, and we still have the opportunity to opt-out if we
> want to at stable-bug-request time (or better, the dev can file their
> own bug to indicate stabilization will not occur or will occur later
> once XYZ are met or w/e)..
>
> We include it in the default metadata.xml template going forward, and
> request all dev's add it to their packages if they want to contribute.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> (Note:  I also recall there being some sort of blacklist mentioned,
> where is the info for that stored? IE, how could I put a package in
> that blacklist?)
>
>

I was thinking something similar yesterday, except I'd rather it be seen
as opt-out rather than opt-in.



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 555 bytes --]