From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4405A1381F3 for ; Wed, 15 May 2013 15:00:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 44511E0871; Wed, 15 May 2013 15:00:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F140E086D for ; Wed, 15 May 2013 15:00:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.160] (CPE002401f30b73-CM001cea3ddad8.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.224.181.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: axs) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E8A233DDD8 for ; Wed, 15 May 2013 15:00:02 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5193A2F3.9070400@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 11:00:03 -0400 From: Ian Stakenvicius User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130503 Thunderbird/17.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to "normal" users References: <20130508190832.0ea16c88@gentoo.org> <518A8901.6030302@gmail.com> <20130510094500.62b0c958@sera-20.lan> <5191F8B7.9080006@gentoo.org> <20130515141755.4d53f21e@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6a1pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 999e3e5b-56d5-4b0e-90f4-cc600f2f76e5 X-Archives-Hash: 78bf7d952f5efeb57d9e12e393085d90 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 15/05/13 10:16 AM, Ben de Groot wrote: > On 15 May 2013 21:41, Fabio Erculiani wrote: >> And (and!) how does all this fit together with eudev? If the idea >> is to either put logind in udev (thus, not creating a separate >> logind ebuild), it means that eudev is already a dead end for >> GNOME users, unless the eudev team is going to provide logind as >> well. > > I'm not sure what the eudev team is planning, but it's been > working well so far for me. And since I don't use Gnome, it's not > an issue as long as other desktop environments are not making the > same mistakes. > We don't know what we're planning either -- this is the first that I heard sys-fs/udev maintainers are considering bundling logind. Gut reaction is that eudev isn't going to do this, but the eudev team of course need to have an actual discussion and decision on it as a project. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlGTovIACgkQ2ugaI38ACPDVZQD/dJUbQ9oMl9BAiMuM+SwtETad PkhRLDVaBEN2FqwXFQIA/3wPouBLnzHT1p1uNL5zfcc8Hf/RgFoKKbaZ/deZM6s2 =xukU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----