From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0491E1381F3 for ; Wed, 8 May 2013 16:34:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6C0D4E0997; Wed, 8 May 2013 16:34:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FEEBE0971 for ; Wed, 8 May 2013 16:34:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.160] (CPE002401f30b73-CM001cea3ddad8.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.224.181.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: axs) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 94AA2335E31 for ; Wed, 8 May 2013 16:34:14 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <518A7E84.1020103@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 12:34:12 -0400 From: Ian Stakenvicius User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130503 Thunderbird/17.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to "normal" users References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6a1pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 5816d620-b08d-4e90-b902-f6874bcf0327 X-Archives-Hash: 1ba5fe969cdeee0d9c73a94fea6db3c7 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 08/05/13 12:06 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Ben de Groot > wrote: >> On 8 May 2013 23:39, Fabio Erculiani wrote: >>> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Ben de Groot >>> wrote: >>> >>> This sounds really wrong (tm) to me. It took me two weeks to >>> kill that silly systemd-units pkg. All the distros around here >>> do install systemd units with their packages and I believe that >>> the council has already spoken about this. >> >> It sounds more wrong to me to be asking normal package >> maintainers to test and maintain unit files, while they don't use >> systemd themselves, nor have it installed. Nor would most of our >> users need this. > > I don't think we are actually asking you to test/maintain them; > you can treat them as a request for permission to perform a > non-maintainer commit. > > If users run into problems, please feel free to copy/assign us on > bugs. This could work; although such a thing implies a bit of a different dynamic than i've seen occurring with anything else... So to be clear, the proposal here is that systemd team/herd would be CC'd on all systemd related bugs and handle all non-upstream systemd unit files? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlGKfoQACgkQ2ugaI38ACPASKgD/TjIEK3QBUjq9ONA7dX/x7xRK 1iRXVlYX9R8OTuX62twBAKgw7L5CaKX1agiPY2Zhu0jvf3x1Ag6kYy8o4wrcnHax =N6Uk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----