From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 889501381F3 for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 18:15:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 85330E0BE1; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 18:15:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AE4DE0BDE for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 18:15:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.160] (CPE002401f30b73-CM001cea3ddad8.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.224.181.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: axs) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 87DEE33BE50 for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 18:15:03 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <517AC421.9000009@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 14:14:57 -0400 From: Ian Stakenvicius User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130321 Thunderbird/17.0.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: oldnet scripts splitting out from OpenRC References: <20130424161606.GA1607@linux1> <51780F2D.7060007@gentoo.org> <20130424172323.GB2323@linux1> <201304241334.37807.vapier@gentoo.org> <20130424175407.GA2404@linux1> <517AB8EA.6040908@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 6d66f451-6a79-464b-ab47-b90d2c9a98ba X-Archives-Hash: 842782f9b17e9d96490b237ae18c17fd -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 26/04/13 02:12 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 07:27:06PM +0200, Chí-Thanh Christopher > Nguyễn wrote: >> William Hubbs schrieb: >>> if we keep a dependency for a while, even behind something >>> like IUSE="+oldnet", when we drop it, people will still be hit >>> if they do emerge --depclean before they emerge gentoo-oldnet. >> >> In my opinion USE flags should toggle dependencies only in >> metapackages or rare exceptions. I suggest to include >> gentoo-oldnet (or whatever name you choose for it) in the @system >> set once it is stable, and until then be a hard dependency of >> OpenRC. > Please note that openrc itself is NOT in the @system set. > > sys-apps/baselayout is, and has PDEPEND on openrc. > Are we all OK with putting the new package in PDEPEND in baselayout alongside the openrc dep, then? Seems that would suffice, plus would allow users that really don't want it to package.provides it away .... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlF6xCAACgkQ2ugaI38ACPAX6AD/WBhfhw/jV0UjyyjCgsDStHw1 WPPRJfMpICU+wT3j8J0BAKOEU+3pWXDif9jBS8X4IA2Ccyq2q9vUAxwQS4WXdgdA =8KK6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----