From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EAAB1381F3 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 01:39:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B9F11E0992; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 01:39:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5CB3E0969 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 01:39:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.122] (bas1-ottawa09-2925289052.dsl.bell.ca [174.92.94.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: axs) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EC04333BF0D for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 01:39:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5178894A.9060506@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 21:39:22 -0400 From: Ian Stakenvicius User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130321 Thunderbird/17.0.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: oldnet scripts splitting out from OpenRC References: <20130424161606.GA1607@linux1> <51780F2D.7060007@gentoo.org> <20130424172323.GB2323@linux1> <201304241334.37807.vapier@gentoo.org> <20130424175407.GA2404@linux1> <20130424223446.GA12947@waltdnes.org> <20130424231701.GA3133@linux1> <51786B9C.9070607@gentoo.org> <20130425011023.GB3133@linux1> In-Reply-To: <20130425011023.GB3133@linux1> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 55711d79-fd11-4adb-bc50-b367c11ee2b4 X-Archives-Hash: 4784d69bcb23daddde995d17bd54fc34 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 24/04/13 09:10 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 07:32:44PM -0400, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina > wrote: >> On 04/24/2013 07:17 PM, William Hubbs wrote: >>> >>> This would actually be cleaner than a bogus dependency in >>> OpenRC. I would probably call it virtual/network-manager >>> though. >>> >> You can't call it virtual/network-manager, that calls to mind, >> you know, net-misc/networkmanager. That's just too confusing >> imho. I wouldn't object to virtual/net, or pretty much anything >> else that isn't confusing. The net scripts are not a network >> manager, networkmanager, wicd, even wpa_supplicant would be >> things I would consider to be network managers. > > But the oldnet scripts do run wpa_supplicant, dhcp clients, etc, > for each interface they manage. > > Newnet doesn't even try that, it just manages static interfaces > and assumes that you will use a dhcp client or something like > wpa_supplicant in standalone mode to control your interfaces. > virtual/network-init ? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlF4iUoACgkQ2ugaI38ACPCvSAEAgSXxzswzYmOfJGl27vtb4C4w 1RjxSoLzAIAl1htEmr4A/3q3QIghpzNlG0Fmawu3eR8ML6BRf+HWwJplIWhvM6F8 =BHp8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----