From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-59835-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DE411381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 23:20:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 413CFE09CE;
	Wed, 24 Apr 2013 23:20:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C0D4E0982
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 23:20:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.3] (unknown [114.91.189.22])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: patrick)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 507D333DBC6
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 23:20:08 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <51786983.6030206@gentoo.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 07:23:47 +0800
From: Patrick Lauer <patrick@gentoo.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [OT/NIT] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86
 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask
References: <20130419091632.D01152171D@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <20130419153043.30ffc50c@portable> <CAB9SyzRq-RuMUU0cXnWYC_+-yv3FSJ=fDw335QmUrqQinsbzQw@mail.gmail.com> <20130421170549.41cfea49@portable> <CAB9SyzQ7f6145adfAcZgMVhdKWBjCHPsVSV-nTOCQbx7rt1PSA@mail.gmail.com> <20130422154033.65a68a40@portable> <pan$1e4f5$800158e2$35c423dd$7f617b73@cox.net> <20130423200053.77ed8b49@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> <20130424112129.25885.qmail@stuge.se>
In-Reply-To: <20130424112129.25885.qmail@stuge.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 05c0469f-6766-45d4-81b1-8d73d7e095d7
X-Archives-Hash: b286456ca505f3f80dab2f1059658d19

On 04/24/2013 07:21 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Jeroen Roovers wrote:
>> Er, you can't be seriously suggesting we will drop repoman checks
>> with the migration to git? I don't see how that would benefit anyone.
> 
> I would argue that repoman and/or corresponding checks should be run
> by a CI system hooked up to the Gerrit instance that developers push to.

So, let me get this straight ...

$now: Developer A makes a change to automake
$now+10min: Change is pushed to CI

...
...


$now + 2 weeks: Initial testrun done, 734 potential issues found
(and 2 weeks is a pretty generous optimistic estimate)


$now + 4 weeks: Triaging and 50% fixing done
$now + 8 weeks: Developer forgot about the issue while going on vacation

$now + 12 weeks: Developer B, unaware of the prior work, pushes the same
change again and waits 2 weeks too

etc. etc.
> 
> Anything else is IMO waste of developers' time and minds.

At least your idea is completely unrelated to reality and a waste of
developer's time and minds, but thanks for bringing up something
completely silly again.