From: Zac Medico <zmedico@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [OT/NIT] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 14:12:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5176F938.1070501@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130423222753.3854fe4d@TOMWIJ-GENTOO>
On 04/23/2013 01:27 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> Maybe the question is rather why `repoman` takes 15 seconds on a quite
> fast system in a package folder that contains 2 ebuilds and 1 metadata.
>
> See the call graph for repoman at http://i.imgur.com/OQTUBdR.png.
>
> A third of the time, ~5 seconds, are spent on 60,000 - 70,000 calls to
> the function that is listed in the bottom; but the ebuilds barely
> list any dependencies. Why are there so much calls to this?
There's lots of redundant repetition involved in repoman's iteration
over the profiles listed in profiles.desc. It may be possible to
optimize away the redundancy by taking advantage of all the things that
each of the profiles have in common.
--
Thanks,
Zac
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-23 21:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20130419091632.D01152171D@flycatcher.gentoo.org>
2013-04-19 13:30 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask Alexis Ballier
2013-04-20 17:28 ` Jeroen Roovers
2013-04-21 12:53 ` Ben de Groot
2013-04-21 14:11 ` Denis Dupeyron
2013-04-21 14:23 ` Rich Freeman
2013-04-21 14:39 ` Denis Dupeyron
2013-04-21 14:38 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2013-04-21 14:50 ` Denis Dupeyron
2013-04-21 15:07 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2013-04-21 15:17 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-04-22 11:43 ` Ben de Groot
2013-04-22 17:13 ` Michał Górny
2013-04-23 16:16 ` Ben de Groot
2013-04-22 12:07 ` Ben de Groot
2013-04-21 14:59 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-04-22 11:56 ` Ben de Groot
2013-04-22 14:00 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-04-23 3:58 ` Ryan Hill
2013-04-23 16:24 ` Ben de Groot
2013-04-24 10:59 ` Duncan
2013-04-30 2:06 ` Ryan Hill
2013-04-21 15:05 ` [OT/NIT] " Alexis Ballier
2013-04-21 15:32 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-04-21 15:43 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-04-21 16:00 ` Peter Stuge
2013-04-21 17:07 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-04-21 18:47 ` Peter Stuge
2013-04-21 18:57 ` Michał Górny
2013-04-22 12:00 ` Ben de Groot
2013-04-22 13:40 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-04-22 22:46 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [OT/NIT] " Duncan
2013-04-23 18:00 ` Jeroen Roovers
2013-04-23 18:20 ` Rich Freeman
2013-04-23 18:37 ` Matt Turner
2013-04-23 19:11 ` Rich Freeman
2013-04-23 19:21 ` Matt Turner
2013-04-23 19:25 ` Ian Stakenvicius
2013-04-23 19:43 ` Rich Freeman
2013-04-23 18:38 ` Matt Turner
2013-04-24 11:18 ` Duncan
2013-04-24 11:21 ` Peter Stuge
2013-04-24 11:25 ` Peter Stuge
2013-04-24 11:47 ` Michael Mol
2013-04-24 13:25 ` Rich Freeman
2013-04-24 20:04 ` Alex Xu
2013-04-24 22:26 ` Rich Freeman
2013-04-24 23:23 ` Patrick Lauer
2013-04-24 23:50 ` Peter Stuge
2013-04-23 19:31 ` Michał Górny
2013-04-23 19:50 ` Jeroen Roovers
2013-04-23 20:27 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-04-23 21:12 ` Zac Medico [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5176F938.1070501@gentoo.org \
--to=zmedico@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox