From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-24335-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1HyUAU-0002xG-PA
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:49:55 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l5DEm9Ot009169;
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:48:09 GMT
Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.178])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l5DEimAp004499
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:44:49 GMT
Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k34so259774wah
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 07:44:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=googlemail.com; s=beta;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
b=NjTZzTmdSqxSFtLjyplsw4Dte2vy/1t3dRqXWFG5iD1Z62UFKby0nl7RP0wP469/jECWwdle+A0VV8i7AObkgwyzaWt6Bk/2Hemi612QczkqmVVBnOyv5RKwOBMZXR3i6OlSF/LlfL6WYtsQc3kBO5sgew6xxdAZIfLNpd/aZI0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=googlemail.com; s=beta;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
b=pniM7v/rNHlE4tNvVgXeJ6fulWf+O57PKapcjvNa4yigqNTV096APx2Ut0i3vw4nvTBO7rS5BQmYH/jy7GWDbAZrYSf0KnDAMZwTDedYohwwkgZa02NJFwRVsLIoSB7AaXqufeydRBWDY6K1VQyirAZrggreCn5ACMKAjnBNffI=
Received: by 10.114.106.1 with SMTP id e1mr717385wac.1181745886079;
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 07:44:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.141.154.9 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 07:44:46 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5158e0dd0706130744u321c7c86kd11385e4485bff92@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:44:46 +0200
From: "banym tuxaner" <banym.tuxaner@googlemail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: guidline to set a timeline of removal of ebuild from stable tree
In-Reply-To: <pan.2007.06.12.16.55.17@cox.net>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_5090_2821564.1181745886019"
References: <C29EC904-37E4-4487-97F6-46EB69DDD8AF@cilly.mine.nu>
<20070612100139.GA4738@ferdyx.org>
<466E772F.6010807@thefreemanclan.net>
<20070612104641.GE4738@ferdyx.org>
<AAC967D1-766E-46E1-9A0A-A1F2B3425F12@cilly.mine.nu>
<4FA373CA-773E-4390-BD91-70F87510D6D9@cilly.mine.nu>
<pan.2007.06.12.16.55.17@cox.net>
X-Archives-Salt: fc025777-7798-4603-9b46-2c7e89267281
X-Archives-Hash: ea7fc3d56f85fce59b75747a4e148df4
------=_Part_5090_2821564.1181745886019
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi,
my opinion is to make the sync machanism more intelligent in this way.
I don't want to have a tree with 2 stable versions or old versions of
ebuilds.
My idea is to let the actual(old) installed ebuild version untouched so you
are able to downgrade after an update, and you are although able to
downgrade to you old stabe version if it is older than just the last version
of the ebuild.
In this way you don't have the problem in the official tree because
everybody is able to downgrade to his old version no matter how old.
so but just an idea
banym
------=_Part_5090_2821564.1181745886019
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi, <br><br>my opinion is to make the sync machanism more intelligent in this way. <br>I don't want to have a tree with 2 stable versions or old versions of ebuilds.<br>My idea is to let the actual(old) installed ebuild version untouched so you are able to downgrade after an update, and you are although able to downgrade to you old stabe version if it is older than just the last version of the ebuild.
<br><br>In this way you don't have the problem in the official tree because everybody is able to downgrade to his old version no matter how old. <br><br>so but just an idea<br><br>banym<br>
------=_Part_5090_2821564.1181745886019--
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list