From: "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed update to pax-utils.eclass
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 20:20:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <514F9840.7030204@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5145B4B9.3070104@gentoo.org>
On 03/17/2013 08:19 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> The hardened team has been working on getting PaX markings moved to
> Extended Attributes rather then putting them in a program header of
> the ELF binaries [1]. The motivation here is that this is a generally
> safer way of doing PaX markings since mangling an ELF binary can break
> things [2].
>
> The last step in the process is getting an eclass on the tree which
> does both xattr as well as elf phdr based PaX markings. We've been
> testing one for a while and we think we've clobbered all the bugs. The
> eclass deviates significantly from the one on the tree, so a I'm not
> sure a diff is the best way to present it. The current version is on
> the hardened-dev overay [3]. It also makes use of a new utility
> called paxctl-ng which does what paxctl did but also with xattr [4].
>
> You may want to look at some documentation too. A updated discussion
> of PaX which includes xattr stuff is at [5]. A migration guide is at
> [6].
>
> Please review. We are in no rush to get this done, so if you find
> bugs or have concerns, add blockers to the tracker [1].
>
>
> Ref.
>
> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=427888
>
> [2] eg skype, https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461668
>
> [3]
> http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/hardened-dev.git;a=blob;f=eclass/pax-utils.eclass;h=b27d5e2f6e503cf47e9e321e441f1fe8c9c1dbd8;hb=646c49292c140491c3e1aee58a82f3c3b6a4e99f
>
> [4] This is part of the sys-apps/elfix package. The repo is at
> http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/elfix.git;a=summary
>
> [5] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/hardened/pax-quickstart.xml
>
> [6] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/hardened/pax-migrate-xattr.xml
>
>
Last call, does anyone have a problem with me updating the
pax-utils.eclass? See Ref [3] above for the code. I'll wait a couple
more days and then do it.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail : blueness@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-25 0:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-17 12:19 [gentoo-dev] Proposed update to pax-utils.eclass Anthony G. Basile
2013-03-25 0:20 ` Anthony G. Basile [this message]
2013-03-27 12:39 ` Gilles Dartiguelongue
2013-03-27 15:22 ` Alec Warner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=514F9840.7030204@gentoo.org \
--to=blueness@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox