public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-dev] About lastriting sys-fs/device-mapper, is that doable?
@ 2013-03-09 10:09 Samuli Suominen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Samuli Suominen @ 2013-03-09 10:09 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

Am I right to think we can finally let sys-fs/device-mapper go?

Everything up-to-date is already forcing up-to-date sys-fs/lvm2 where 
the up-to-date device-mapper lives.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2013-03-09 10:11 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-03-09 10:09 [gentoo-dev] About lastriting sys-fs/device-mapper, is that doable? Samuli Suominen

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox