Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass: autotools-multilib-minimal

[Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@gentoo.org>]

On 24/02/13 16:17, hasufell wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/24/2013 11:11 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
>> On 24/02/2013 11:06, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> Then don't put 'autotools' in the name.
>>
>> +1
>>
>
> That would be multilib-minimal.eclass then?

Sounds good to me.

> ABCD also suggested something else:
> autotools-multilib.eclass -> autotools-utils-multilib.eclass

This makes sense too, autotools-multilib.eclass is misleading as it 
embeds the "unrelated" autotools-utils.eclass

So it seems currently that some are against this eclass, some are 
against the whole idea and favour multilib-portage, some are against 
using autotools-utils.eclass for this, ...
Some people are already committing the eclass version changes/fixes to 
tree, some are filing bug reports about bugs caused by it, ...

It would be nice if people agreed but I guess that is not happening, so 
i'll be pushing this eclass to tree under name 'multilib-minimal.eclass' 
if I don't hear compelling arguments for not doing so, or in case you 
push it before me

- Samuli