From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-58798-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org> Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C989198005 for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:35:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E4279E0682; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:35:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ee0-f43.google.com (mail-ee0-f43.google.com [74.125.83.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D56C9E0662 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:35:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f43.google.com with SMTP id c50so1381924eek.30 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 06:35:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PtueiOWLvSIFpGspmsPjxXBvF88JbgTZIxwFYeW8Ew4=; b=ys366wLfvh7C9W/LKR/T2NloF500/C30GtcwIFFRACxiE8cjzpBEJhiPUaTa8i+vp9 Ib0JYCrxCcmySver1/5Xsz5c9RwC34nKXPTLv1dYLKVtacNJHNQX0NifAA/MH987UBrE cbjtYoT32r1vr4eqKoG//ymvRTUFHBwa74/kXfSCOdMdv6de7p6tsNOc3LczQtQcQjQ7 ccFaHNSCm8AA29LZZG7ScrFaO68CGPe7lruBskNLrQ7wxqqEsY+AMb143CSk4m2fCiND JGsyZHu8H3ILOK1EdEQdkg2Xd2ztS/clafYvpOBhhYGzW+poTnYkxaIF4/I+LFl+0Apf CMrA== X-Received: by 10.14.3.70 with SMTP id 46mr39893083eeg.2.1361802902340; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 06:35:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.1.21.16] (dustpuppy.is.co.za. [196.14.169.11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 46sm18681731eea.3.2013.02.25.06.34.59 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 25 Feb 2013 06:35:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <512B7632.90503@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:33:22 +0200 From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130114 Thunderbird/17.0.2 Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: kerberos, virtuals, rattling cages References: <512ACBA1.7090209@gmail.com> <512B10E5.5080408@gentoo.org> <CAAr7Pr8VPhEKTmKgz1ais-NGara+QFr7HXazmfAmMpj+51tt3g@mail.gmail.com> <20130225080249.GB2634@gaby.caf.com.tr> <pan$ecfce$57354ce3$e14203ff$2d9d3779@cox.net> In-Reply-To: <pan$ecfce$57354ce3$e14203ff$2d9d3779@cox.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 32e267ba-ed51-455b-b6c1-b3f5d9304d5d X-Archives-Hash: 9a4ea61f74b80619ab8180f3a9ddd9b4 On 25/02/2013 13:03, Duncan wrote: > Eray Aslan posted on Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:02:49 +0200 as excerpted: > >>>> I don't think samba will support MIT, since it's kinda windows >>>> focused. >> >> Ugh, no. MIT is not windows focused > > ... But samba is... > > > As far as the thread in general goes, the question arises, if you're > running both samba and nfs, why? They're both network-based-filesystems > that in theory at least should have reasonably similar functionality, so > an admittedly not particularly clueful reaction is "if it hurts when you > do that, stop doing it". > Two words: mixed environment In corporate networks it is very common to share the same backend over both smb/cifs and nfs. Windows clients can't easily deal with anything other than cifs. Linux client invariably whinge at length about how the performance of samba sucks. Solution: run both protocols, everyone wins. It only goes south when AD/Kerberos enters the mix. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckinnon@gmail.com