From: Jonathan Callen <abcd@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: New eclass: autotools-multilib-minimal
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 13:05:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <512A567F.7020904@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130224165302.7470cb1b@pomiocik.lan>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 02/24/2013 10:53 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> I think that base.eclass is silently intended for removal at some
> point in the future. While we're here, we should probably mark it
> deprecated.
>
The problem with deprecating base.eclass and telling people to use
autotools-utils.eclass instead is that base.eclass also defines a
src_prepare that is used for eclasses that support *non*-autotools
build systems, such as cmake-utils.eclass. Requiring that support to
be copied around to each of the eclasses that currently inherits base
would allow the usual issues with copying code around.
- --
Jonathan Callen (abcd)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/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=cyEa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-24 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-24 0:34 [gentoo-dev] New eclass: autotools-multilib-minimal hasufell
2013-02-24 4:22 ` hasufell
2013-02-24 10:06 ` Michał Górny
2013-02-24 10:11 ` Diego Elio Pettenò
2013-02-24 14:17 ` hasufell
2013-02-24 14:33 ` Pacho Ramos
2013-02-27 13:01 ` Samuli Suominen
2013-02-27 20:13 ` Michał Górny
2013-02-27 20:15 ` Pacho Ramos
2013-02-24 14:57 ` Michał Górny
2013-02-24 15:12 ` hasufell
2013-02-24 15:12 ` Pacho Ramos
2013-02-24 15:53 ` Michał Górny
2013-02-24 16:21 ` Pacho Ramos
2013-02-24 16:28 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-02-24 16:58 ` Samuli Suominen
2013-02-24 18:56 ` Michał Górny
2013-02-24 19:40 ` hasufell
2013-02-24 18:05 ` Jonathan Callen [this message]
2013-02-24 18:18 ` [gentoo-dev] " Michał Górny
2013-02-24 16:22 ` [gentoo-dev] " Alexis Ballier
2013-02-24 16:42 ` hasufell
2013-02-24 18:46 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-02-24 22:39 ` Samuli Suominen
2013-02-28 1:06 ` hasufell
2013-02-28 8:30 ` Michał Górny
2013-02-28 15:16 ` hasufell
2013-03-02 2:50 ` hasufell
2013-03-02 15:07 ` Michał Górny
2013-03-02 15:13 ` hasufell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=512A567F.7020904@gentoo.org \
--to=abcd@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox