From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D4CF138B49 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 19:40:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7466C21C037; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 19:40:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74EB6E0024 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 19:40:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (pool-71-245-176-92.pitbpa.fios.verizon.net [71.245.176.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zerochaos) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 601E433DDC2 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 19:40:14 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <512526B6.100@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:40:38 -0500 From: "Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130128 Thunderbird/17.0.2 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: linux-firmware References: <511F8D2E.1080006@flameeyes.eu> <511F9A9F.8040206@gentoo.org> <511F9ADE.2050503@flameeyes.eu> <20767.41371.270947.851486@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <5120654B.6050406@gentoo.org> <20768.43798.568305.561675@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <512389BF.9090504@gentoo.org> <5124CCE9.50203@flameeyes.eu> <20130220162802.30963.qmail@stuge.se> <512508C3.4020406@flameeyes.eu> In-Reply-To: <512508C3.4020406@flameeyes.eu> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 9c35f303-b4a8-403a-a6e6-37b7b3d8a10d X-Archives-Hash: 124406c9d01de68629745a0edd88fc00 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/20/2013 12:32 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > On 20/02/2013 18:28, Rich Freeman wrote: >> Agreed, especially if only 1-2 files are involved. If it is a bunch >> that could get unwieldy. Wasn't really thinking about that option. > > That being the case, splitting them in multiple packages might indeed be > a better option. Yes I know I'm the one pushing for using a single > package — as long as it doesn't have licensing issues of course. > I'm fine splitting the package into linux-firmware[non-free] and linux-firmware-restricted (or something like that). When I say I want one one ebuild for all firmware I really don't care to include fetch-restricted and the like in that. I'm very happy to have one ebuild for free and redistributable firmware and then have multiple other ebuilds as appropriate for the non-redistributable stuff. Thanks, Zero -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRJSa2AAoJEKXdFCfdEflKSM0P/jjNsGH7MW8rcCRkMsL/i4mw 08CBJ/mxl81YnKPZGoXS0JcMG9LmCjW+2f87JBmMAk8cOPJhzlGV7V8y7GlY+BgF oz37nfOqJVciY2sWqPze+H1bH0crrrBZhIDTnCfo/ryRPR+oTTQdO4xRxIXOe3Fo Fw6VJPQkCLFFMwraOYBxcrXPmGQ7RVz8MvmyeVcJH5lUFh7wi/dPu/Iwqu2dX4Yc faXOCBzU06r62CvWt1+7msouO6Y+f4Hh1XcOe2cXCLsZJj+74WiQzXeQB7iQv0F+ zE/p6Stee5yhrn9bhB/mASeBk9YvyztUng8IIigNdnFovAhUyZp86wvEt7xd0rqp N8U7WHnSYzfU8Wntr/p1ZHHYsvmdwJToRsh6e9+IrX0i82W+I6b6s9L0n1+SqIIY fCacto2idRN4k9lQ51beEq7ZqqCcLpPuWthTzVT9E3obCH8UrFlFFvImMtdJyMq1 4J8MWRVSWUPwEn84Yu5RpPxl3aOmqfv5cVzUqXmYy1hYQb0P4e/43+L0hyQvthPR N6htokFjS0iWpYklp6hkSt+VdBUf6wF/4ytNjeAd0BhpRWK/diDiysKDTHVAPswB 0PX6cX++uYPVNTD+PdaW2PbFVwzKgCzUI185dw26rBjarRJpfhdcrPyIMXGeEqa6 RoR0efRHAnraGw/qqL8v =lAF5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----