From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8CB8138B13 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:02:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CA7E021C017; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:02:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFAB1E0029 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:02:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.26.5] (ip98-164-195-43.oc.oc.cox.net [98.164.195.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zmedico) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0A70833DC3A for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:02:35 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5123B029.9010604@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:02:33 -0800 From: Zac Medico User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130112 Thunderbird/17.0.2 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we list sys-apps/sed in DEPEND References: <20130219131033.GN9772@schlaumatte.Speedport_W723_V_Typ_A_1_00_096> <1361287306.3997.233.camel@big_daddy.dol-sen.ca> In-Reply-To: <1361287306.3997.233.camel@big_daddy.dol-sen.ca> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: d8a66c68-986a-4af5-a8a3-18e874f2a582 X-Archives-Hash: bc8a346dc22edbd54e5e09ee5b315a8c On 02/19/2013 07:21 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote: > On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 14:10 +0100, Thomas Kahle wrote: >> ... if it is used in the ebuild? >> >> It is a system package here on amd64, but is it everywhere? >> >> Cheers, >> Thomas >> > > Only if the pkg is also a system package. I recently ran into a problem > running a catalyst build because portage-utils did not list the xz-utils > dep which was another system package. It failed to unpack because > xz-utils was still waiting to be merged. I was running catalyst with > --jobs=3. If it's not in $PORTDIR/profiles/default/linux/packages.build then it's not necessarily included in stage1 and therefore you can't rely on it for stage1 -> stage2 -> stage3. If that's the case, then it has to be in *DEPEND for anything in stage3. -- Thanks, Zac