From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DABB1389A1 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:47:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D4FB921C029; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:47:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ee0-f46.google.com (mail-ee0-f46.google.com [74.125.83.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E159E011A for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:47:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f46.google.com with SMTP id e49so3333927eek.33 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 08:47:47 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=xLiCh70VNepCxfSlyGrWw1K3bgraozuDqAGf8GD6hMQ=; b=Ci2KXq8rMvkAW6uST20LilQb0XmkEVqNd9XyE8iuYj25JOFIQFaCDppT38uMl+me9/ uhR2Vvph4abNi/03M2JsFdOtyOTgIcX2Zvr8ucOzhqqunC1xSaKK3uEPEuG8DCZ6x5Dq 3iEE7A9ivFfgse9fjwwB7Go251E2o/s1t5/4O0G7NX0+jo2XKmHOLZ/V5EXeeucufELd 0LjKWVTr2WhycBecB4jDSTZPhKJAAnvhEq2BCHak+bp2C7ubpdzDM9KMjgfCbeyHfp5l GvBYD8OZ3z7jufdIjXTujaPlhaUe7KVH62Nm/VKsoNBPQLwGwDmyWYpWMdatl0O52fFL jqBQ== X-Received: by 10.14.209.8 with SMTP id r8mr23230946eeo.46.1360601267024; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 08:47:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from saladin.home.flameeyes.eu (adsl-ull-109-154.49-151.net24.it. [151.49.154.109]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z5sm25043743eep.16.2013.02.11.08.47.45 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Feb 2013 08:47:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <511920AF.9030106@flameeyes.eu> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 17:47:43 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?RGllZ28gRWxpbyBQZXR0ZW7Dsg==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130113 Thunderbird/17.0.2 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] libusb-compat preference in virtual/libusb:0 not strong enough? References: <20130211151728.2557.qmail@stuge.se> <51190C5C.9000903@flameeyes.eu> <20130211164417.12789.qmail@stuge.se> In-Reply-To: <20130211164417.12789.qmail@stuge.se> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmrhzw2hGxdMAjBXQ0ch9gh538aKi32IP6685nxP97euCczZ6D1XxNiG+kVpksrQuzMZg0E X-Archives-Salt: 8da69927-f171-43a9-981c-91f0b775c14a X-Archives-Hash: d16951c85b9e4dbeb75a43f1ff3960a4 On 11/02/2013 17:44, Peter Stuge wrote: > If my guess is correct then you are really way too eager to > misunderstand what people intend to transmit, given a less than > unambiguous message. No, it's because of what Maxim already said: it's not an LTR/RTL issue. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flameeyes@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/