From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10F8B138988 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 03:10:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1209021C062; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 03:10:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 822FC21C04C for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 03:10:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.26.5] (ip98-164-195-43.oc.oc.cox.net [98.164.195.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zmedico) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD9BC33E4F2 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 03:10:10 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <51186111.9030507@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 19:10:09 -0800 From: Zac Medico User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130112 Thunderbird/17.0.2 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New, shiny EAPI=5 profiles: volunteer, procedure, preparations References: <201301122147.26044.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <20130211003419.76383326@pomiocik.lan> <201302110045.07238.dilfridge@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <201302110045.07238.dilfridge@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 6973159e-4443-4a48-acb9-ec02bce4c066 X-Archives-Hash: 4f0a5a29d1813beeea8b4b72f3e1a0f3 On 02/10/2013 03:45 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > Am Montag, 11. Februar 2013, 00:34:19 schrieb Michał Górny: > >>> >>> actually *do* to one's system? >> >> Out of curiosity, does portage suggest switching to the new profiles >> even if it doesn't support its EAPI? > > Unfortunately, it seems yes. (Feature request?) It's possible to include additional instructions in the deprecated file. All lines after the first one as upgrade instructions. For future portage versions, I've fixed it to behavior better: http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=commit;h=34d8c817080f34f1a0b44cf05b99beacfc0d6314 This fix updates the profile deprecation warning to look like this: !!! Your current profile is deprecated and not supported anymore. !!! Use eselect profile to update your profile. !!! Please upgrade to the following profile if possible: default/linux/x86/13.0/desktop !!! Unable to parse profile: '/usr/portage/profiles/default/linux/x86/13.0/desktop' !!! ParseError: Profile contains unsupported EAPI '5': '/usr/portage/profiles/eapi-5-files/eapi' * You must update portage before you can migrate to the above profile. * In order to update portage, run 'emerge --oneshot portage'. -- Thanks, Zac