From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9645D13896D for ; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 15:05:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 06CC421C07B; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 15:05:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBF6721C016 for ; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 15:05:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.4.5] (blfd-4d08fbe6.pool.mediaWays.net [77.8.251.230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hasufell) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A4F833E270 for ; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 15:05:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5117B733.4070105@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 16:05:23 +0100 From: hasufell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130123 Thunderbird/17.0.2 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrites: media-gfx/picasa, dev-python/papyon, net-voip/telepathy-butterfly, sci-visualization/paraview, x11-misc/xdaf References: <1360486867.26312.0.camel@belkin4> <511788EE.1010307@gentoo.org> <1360497549.26312.7.camel@belkin4> In-Reply-To: <1360497549.26312.7.camel@belkin4> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 9fa70bcf-b06f-4085-9ec9-a889c0cf2ce2 X-Archives-Hash: f4b38e4a02ca5c960d90566ccaf10676 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/10/2013 12:47 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote:> Would anyone be > Would anyone be terribly upset if I started pillaging this silly > overlay? (And any other overlays that look like they are fun) > Go ahead, I will help you. On 02/10/2013 12:59 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > That is because looks nobody from sci team has enough time to move > things from sci overlay to the tree (probably because it's being > maintained there by people without commit access). I take that as a free card to add myself to the sci herd. As for the overlay discussion, there should only be two reasons to have ebuilds in a seperate overlay: they depend on dropped packages or they are unsupportable (e.g. because they are in early alpha stage or broken in some ways). -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRF7czAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWz4gsH/jpvNiLpVKrnLM2T2lwS1oFx uvrfBbBgX6ROEF0aQ6Um8GnJFqMkpW76O7R9hVHoF1ZMISh7iTQKw8eBMMKj/3ib 1O2kgUB6Y4yMXvZrq9RM7BJzupTQp8qdMMaozf8sJ34DhGKMVS8xRHWrgkJRq8FD ZL/tbImEVDd97IazDLXPUxN77shvo2oYHOd9peiI9aVRWti72Kyzg8M6cxQ5ek33 ahLfeNpjw+Bg+k16WM6Fi0v9H64hSOSeeZzwaBoaAO0w3JlTx8ch2/8OBPFSg6gF 2aS3DoIG1K7JR1i+LLJ2x2sPUWPjPKcDlknGuNkZ2HlTP3gZziZusclboy/NjGI= =LGQV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----