From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8921D138968 for ; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 11:46:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 537C621C0A6; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 11:46:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EA0F21C09E for ; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 11:46:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (unknown [114.91.188.29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: patrick) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3BDA833E4A3 for ; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 11:46:00 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <511788EE.1010307@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 19:47:58 +0800 From: Patrick Lauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrites: media-gfx/picasa, dev-python/papyon, net-voip/telepathy-butterfly, sci-visualization/paraview, x11-misc/xdaf References: <1360486867.26312.0.camel@belkin4> In-Reply-To: <1360486867.26312.0.camel@belkin4> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 646c79ba-ee08-4bda-b4d9-5c12bf8caa7c X-Archives-Hash: 38c6501df4b4eb2f1773e9747d4c40ab On 02/10/2013 05:01 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > # Pacho Ramos (10 Feb 2013) > # Fails with gcc-4.7, crashes (#301946, #312073), problems with > # boost (#319921), problems with python-2.7 (#338826), really old > # version in the tree, people should move to sci overlay one (#424659). > # Removal in a month. > sci-visualization/paraview So instead of moving things from random overlays to the tree we remove packages now, remove features from other packages because of that (openfoam) and then ... tell users to use an overlay? Somehow this appears not well thought out to me. Would anyone be terribly upset if I started pillaging this silly overlay? (And any other overlays that look like they are fun)