From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB8F1388B3 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 13:55:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A053821C029; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 13:55:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ee0-f48.google.com (mail-ee0-f48.google.com [74.125.83.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F28C21C002 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 13:55:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f48.google.com with SMTP id t10so801427eei.21 for ; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 05:55:41 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=cJkfHmAe4NmTJIi2g7K/CJEFQeuYxmbvArBe5U3V8RQ=; b=NAI858S7GBKMPX/kBEuhfTgta6qVXMOAtvc+mUtthQhuez0YYMKXEKdZ5SqckpeFWC DlNXFT0f1ZQUg17J9bEmUbdtwe6wLwcs0IoLNRFR7byLYz8iw07givgw3d8F0JbOCVMU i0JOB2ZNs/dJMYAWshvMS/NF9zdWpwgR7CqR8lOsc6V+uxeiM1FQE4RXj/421gppD4BG wUlkpPuEAzOM/pI8ZgBE0MBWMaqn4Gd2lc3c6O0DKVy9gc978ZvX0Ii3QUFO3FUeIZBP j1906VyymGKKZkUnQicNzONZz0wGt5grf+O1Aa0cWOlF2PcZGdAis+mErYgN91ZWNN99 TdQQ== X-Received: by 10.14.194.4 with SMTP id l4mr351390een.12.1360158940880; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 05:55:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from saladin.home.flameeyes.eu (adsl-ull-76-153.49-151.net24.it. [151.49.153.76]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q42sm27678840eem.14.2013.02.06.05.55.38 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Feb 2013 05:55:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <511260D8.8070606@flameeyes.eu> Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 14:55:36 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?RGllZ28gRWxpbyBQZXR0ZW7Dsg==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130113 Thunderbird/17.0.2 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] /var/run or /run for init scripts? References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkh1IORdAXREApcdEcbNVmjHrpZ3BaF2ySvoXXSJcpXFVRb7pv5FNqeA/Fqji4mytFG1UDn X-Archives-Salt: 3ee36978-485f-4c2c-976d-cb3d63fae559 X-Archives-Hash: 3b5b18d462295a10518297fd21a369ee On 06/02/2013 14:52, Markos Chandras wrote: > I see a lot of inconsistencies in the init scripts. Some of them are > using /var/run, others use /run. I just checked my box, and there is > no /var/run although some init scripts are trying to use it. Which one > is the correct one and why do we have both? The following guide only > mentions /var/run We should be migrating to /run at this point. http://goo.gl/hrWcN -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flameeyes@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/