From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01D451386EA for ; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 21:16:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2F02A21C0C2; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 21:16:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D16A21C003 for ; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 21:16:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.26.5] (ip98-164-195-43.oc.oc.cox.net [98.164.195.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zmedico) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4D35633DABC for ; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 21:16:43 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <51059939.6070300@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 13:16:41 -0800 From: Zac Medico User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130112 Thunderbird/17.0.2 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New, shiny EAPI=5 profiles: volunteer, procedure, preparations References: <201301122147.26044.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <201301182137.10840.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <201301270026.45926.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <1359286008.2927.14.camel@belkin4> In-Reply-To: <1359286008.2927.14.camel@belkin4> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: ad531d8c-f848-4ffe-b9bd-134517a3f9a2 X-Archives-Hash: ef470dbfce659a14a434fc2f8a849d7d On 01/27/2013 03:26 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El dom, 27-01-2013 a las 00:26 +0100, Andreas K. Huettel escribió: >> Just to keep everyone updated, ... >> >>> FYI, the new 13.0 profiles are now all available in profiles.desc, for now >>> all with status "dev" (i.e. repoman includes them only when you request >>> developer profile checking). >>> >>> This means the procedure below is complete up to and including point 5) >>> now. >>> >>> Please consider changing your profile symlink manually and testing the new >>> profile tree. In case of problems, please file a bug and assign it to me >>> (or tell me if I'm around). >>> >>> If all goes well, we'll continue in a week. >>> >> >> A small bug in repoman turned up when testing the EAPI=5 profiles, and >> therefore we will wait for the next stable portage version before the 10.0 >> profiles are deprecated. So, another 3-4 weeks to go maybe. >> >> [The only alternative would be to require all devs to run at least ~arch >> portage, since the bug only affects repoman, not emerge.] >> >> Cheers, >> Andreas >> > > Maybe other option would be to have a portage version like current > stable + repoman fix and fast stabilize as soon as possible I think the latest portage release (2.1.11.50) should be fine. It has lots of other fixes that will be nice to have in stable. I plan to file a stable request in about 1.5 weeks. -- Thanks, Zac