From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-57934-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5051B138669
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 00:38:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BA38E21C0F9;
	Fri, 25 Jan 2013 00:37:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail2.viabit.com (mail2.viabit.com [65.246.80.16])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85A0621C0F1
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 00:37:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.1.1.204] (unknown [65.213.236.244])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail2.viabit.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3YshCj0F5Vz1hfM
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 19:37:53 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=orlitzky.com; s=mail2;
	t=1359074273; bh=JC0zw5yAfX+D1+4cin3i/+FjFWmXgG2ILkA7FS6kiVU=;
	h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To;
	b=GCTjS2TIgJS2GYAiO1LAe1uMNR8NuXXpN6nOUpyBRTnOn+ZYXUj1jK9HYJltGGCb6
	 +3X0/FdHhLvoDxjRs2yxcQAPqdGyAvXKcFD/cINZXiKK2zPxxI6lNKE3qfHDxIQgvP
	 J4wcJZjv5qBztmZHZHOjdwgQ1NvqZBK/f4RWQbC8=
Message-ID: <5101D3E0.8020106@orlitzky.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 19:37:52 -0500
From: Michael Orlitzky <michael@orlitzky.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.10) Gecko/20121116 Thunderbird/10.0.10
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: CONFIG_CHECK_FATAL, making CONFIG_CHECKS
 fatal by default
References: <robbat2-20130122T032417-835825558Z@orbis-terrarum.net> <50FE73F1.6090102@gmail.com> <CAGfcS_=88SEJhewnFiB8M2MUS7S14Lb-DOkxa9M153mseOsudQ@mail.gmail.com> <pan.2013.01.24.17.49.05@cox.net> <CAGfcS_k9P_uX16Eh2u+hqHy71VQMmDj-5QxqrcqsZszf4WhwfA@mail.gmail.com> <51017B0A.4060608@gentoo.org> <CAGfcS_n1ub3xYKtS2WK-ni9JxmTM_xqAOKbdHYoBaSdFOP8RvQ@mail.gmail.com> <510183B2.8020603@orlitzky.com> <5101844B.8070005@gentoo.org> <510189CE.3020700@orlitzky.com> <510198FD.5000901@gmail.com> <51019C17.9000909@orlitzky.com> <51019D67.7040305@orlitzky.com> <5101D1E4.8000707@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5101D1E4.8000707@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: e2b0896f-ce28-4b80-a187-3ac5cc354999
X-Archives-Hash: 9370ff795bdf192702bc061778cc07b4

On 01/24/13 19:29, vivo75@gmail.com wrote:
> actually it wasn't an issue that could made a system un-bootable but was
> like this:
> 
> * udev-129 could live with CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED=y
> * udev-130 require CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED not set
> 
> The example was given just to underline the fact that a different emerge
> order may be required.
> 

So you upgrade the kernel (unsetting CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED), and then
upgrade udev (which would now pass the config check). Same situation?