From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6745313859E for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 17:03:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 62B1E21C13B; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 17:03:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 600A221C08F for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 17:03:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.42.210.40] (unknown [89.204.130.40]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: chithanh) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3786B33DA84 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 17:03:34 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <50FC235B.3050909@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 18:03:23 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?Q2jDrS1UaGFuaCBDaHJpc3RvcGhlciBOZ3V54buFbg==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Firefox/17.0 SeaMonkey/2.14 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] USE flags dri, cups, pppd References: <201301182149.38247.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <4061553.YcA2iXMzmW@porto> <50FC0BAA.3030606@gentoo.org> <1358698026.4289.125.camel@big_daddy.dol-sen.ca> In-Reply-To: <1358698026.4289.125.camel@big_daddy.dol-sen.ca> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 31d14fee-588f-49ff-bb17-11d18a9bfcff X-Archives-Hash: 354f75191dddb944b81c050c3e871537 Brian Dolbec schrieb: > But, doesn't your point above very strongly suggest that IUSE=+dri > should be set on those pkgs irregardless of where/if the dri USE flag > should be set in some profile. We can either set it in the base profile, then there is no need for IUSE="+dri". Or we can set it in every single ebuild that has the dri flag. I prefer the former because it reduces our maintenance burden. > With that in place, then moving it to > the desktop profile from the base wouldn't be bad, would it? If we have it as IUSE default, it can be removed from the profiles entirely. Having it only in the desktop profile is not good in any scenario I can think of. Best regards, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn