public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.6 stabilization
@ 2013-01-07  1:22 Ryan Hill
  2013-01-07  1:58 ` Anthony G. Basile
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ryan Hill @ 2013-01-07  1:22 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 367 bytes --]

This is way past due so I'd like to get 4.6 into stable.  There are hardly any
blockers on bug #418383 which makes me go "?!", so if anyone knows of any
issues please let us know.



-- 
gcc-porting
toolchain, wxwidgets            learn a language baby, it's that kind of place
@ gentoo.org                   where low card is hunger and high card is taste

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.6 stabilization
  2013-01-07  1:22 [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.6 stabilization Ryan Hill
@ 2013-01-07  1:58 ` Anthony G. Basile
  2013-01-07  8:54 ` Dirkjan Ochtman
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Anthony G. Basile @ 2013-01-07  1:58 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

On 01/06/2013 08:22 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> This is way past due so I'd like to get 4.6 into stable.  There are hardly any
> blockers on bug #418383 which makes me go "?!", so if anyone knows of any
> issues please let us know.
>
>
>
I was actually thinking of poking you about this.  I've been using 4.6 
on numerous catalyst builds (various arches + uclibc + hardening) for 
over 6 months now.  It gives me less issues than 4.5.  Please do it.  
Thanks :)

-- 
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail    : blueness@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP  : 8040 5A4D 8709 21B1 1A88  33CE 979C AF40 D045 5535
GnuPG ID  : D0455535



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.6 stabilization
  2013-01-07  1:22 [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.6 stabilization Ryan Hill
  2013-01-07  1:58 ` Anthony G. Basile
@ 2013-01-07  8:54 ` Dirkjan Ochtman
  2013-01-07  9:52 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
  2013-01-07 16:13 ` Richard Yao
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Dirkjan Ochtman @ 2013-01-07  8:54 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: Gentoo Development

On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@gentoo.org> wrote:
> This is way past due so I'd like to get 4.6 into stable.  There are hardly any
> blockers on bug #418383 which makes me go "?!", so if anyone knows of any
> issues please let us know.

+1. I know I've been clicking around those bug trees a few times now
to figure out what was holding it up.

Cheers,

Dirkjan


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.6 stabilization
  2013-01-07  1:22 [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.6 stabilization Ryan Hill
  2013-01-07  1:58 ` Anthony G. Basile
  2013-01-07  8:54 ` Dirkjan Ochtman
@ 2013-01-07  9:52 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
  2013-01-07 16:13 ` Richard Yao
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn @ 2013-01-07  9:52 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

Ryan Hill schrieb:
> This is way past due so I'd like to get 4.6 into stable. There are
> hardly any blockers on bug #418383 which makes me go "?!", so if
> anyone knows of any issues please let us know.

There is still one blocker to bug 346809 which may cause headaches for
arm users.

[4.6/ICE] in simplify_gen_subreg_concatn, at lower-subreg.c:489
(x11-libs/qt-webkit-4.8.0)
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401561

Best regards,
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.6 stabilization
  2013-01-07  1:22 [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.6 stabilization Ryan Hill
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-01-07  9:52 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
@ 2013-01-07 16:13 ` Richard Yao
  2013-01-08  9:50   ` vivo75
  3 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Richard Yao @ 2013-01-07 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 410 bytes --]

On 01/06/2013 08:22 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> This is way past due so I'd like to get 4.6 into stable.  There are hardly any
> blockers on bug #418383 which makes me go "?!", so if anyone knows of any
> issues please let us know.
> 
> 
> 

We probably should not stabilize on ARM until the following is fixed:

https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401561

Other architectures are probably okay.


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 900 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.6 stabilization
  2013-01-07 16:13 ` Richard Yao
@ 2013-01-08  9:50   ` vivo75
  2013-01-09  3:05     ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: vivo75 @ 2013-01-08  9:50 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev; +Cc: Richard Yao

Il 07/01/2013 17:13, Richard Yao ha scritto:
> On 01/06/2013 08:22 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
>> This is way past due so I'd like to get 4.6 into stable.  There are hardly any
>> blockers on bug #418383 which makes me go "?!", so if anyone knows of any
>> issues please let us know.
>>
>>
>>
> We probably should not stabilize on ARM until the following is fixed:
>
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401561
>
> Other architectures are probably okay.
>
What about jumping straight to 4.7.2 do you (arm-team) think it's possible?



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.6 stabilization
  2013-01-08  9:50   ` vivo75
@ 2013-01-09  3:05     ` Ryan Hill
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ryan Hill @ 2013-01-09  3:05 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 651 bytes --]

On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 10:50:32 +0100
"vivo75@gmail.com" <vivo75@gmail.com> wrote:

> > We probably should not stabilize on ARM until the following is fixed:
> >
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401561
> >
> > Other architectures are probably okay.
> >
> What about jumping straight to 4.7.2 do you (arm-team) think it's possible?

No.  All the packages we've fixed for 4.7 need to be stabilized first.  4.7
isn't even unmasked yet (my next task).


-- 
gcc-porting
toolchain, wxwidgets            learn a language baby, it's that kind of place
@ gentoo.org                   where low card is hunger and high card is taste

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-01-09  2:55 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-01-07  1:22 [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.6 stabilization Ryan Hill
2013-01-07  1:58 ` Anthony G. Basile
2013-01-07  8:54 ` Dirkjan Ochtman
2013-01-07  9:52 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2013-01-07 16:13 ` Richard Yao
2013-01-08  9:50   ` vivo75
2013-01-09  3:05     ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox