* [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.6 stabilization
@ 2013-01-07 1:22 Ryan Hill
2013-01-07 1:58 ` Anthony G. Basile
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ryan Hill @ 2013-01-07 1:22 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 367 bytes --]
This is way past due so I'd like to get 4.6 into stable. There are hardly any
blockers on bug #418383 which makes me go "?!", so if anyone knows of any
issues please let us know.
--
gcc-porting
toolchain, wxwidgets learn a language baby, it's that kind of place
@ gentoo.org where low card is hunger and high card is taste
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.6 stabilization
2013-01-07 1:22 [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.6 stabilization Ryan Hill
@ 2013-01-07 1:58 ` Anthony G. Basile
2013-01-07 8:54 ` Dirkjan Ochtman
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Anthony G. Basile @ 2013-01-07 1:58 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On 01/06/2013 08:22 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> This is way past due so I'd like to get 4.6 into stable. There are hardly any
> blockers on bug #418383 which makes me go "?!", so if anyone knows of any
> issues please let us know.
>
>
>
I was actually thinking of poking you about this. I've been using 4.6
on numerous catalyst builds (various arches + uclibc + hardening) for
over 6 months now. It gives me less issues than 4.5. Please do it.
Thanks :)
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail : blueness@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 8040 5A4D 8709 21B1 1A88 33CE 979C AF40 D045 5535
GnuPG ID : D0455535
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.6 stabilization
2013-01-07 1:22 [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.6 stabilization Ryan Hill
2013-01-07 1:58 ` Anthony G. Basile
@ 2013-01-07 8:54 ` Dirkjan Ochtman
2013-01-07 9:52 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2013-01-07 16:13 ` Richard Yao
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Dirkjan Ochtman @ 2013-01-07 8:54 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Gentoo Development
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@gentoo.org> wrote:
> This is way past due so I'd like to get 4.6 into stable. There are hardly any
> blockers on bug #418383 which makes me go "?!", so if anyone knows of any
> issues please let us know.
+1. I know I've been clicking around those bug trees a few times now
to figure out what was holding it up.
Cheers,
Dirkjan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.6 stabilization
2013-01-07 1:22 [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.6 stabilization Ryan Hill
2013-01-07 1:58 ` Anthony G. Basile
2013-01-07 8:54 ` Dirkjan Ochtman
@ 2013-01-07 9:52 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2013-01-07 16:13 ` Richard Yao
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn @ 2013-01-07 9:52 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Ryan Hill schrieb:
> This is way past due so I'd like to get 4.6 into stable. There are
> hardly any blockers on bug #418383 which makes me go "?!", so if
> anyone knows of any issues please let us know.
There is still one blocker to bug 346809 which may cause headaches for
arm users.
[4.6/ICE] in simplify_gen_subreg_concatn, at lower-subreg.c:489
(x11-libs/qt-webkit-4.8.0)
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401561
Best regards,
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.6 stabilization
2013-01-07 1:22 [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.6 stabilization Ryan Hill
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-07 9:52 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
@ 2013-01-07 16:13 ` Richard Yao
2013-01-08 9:50 ` vivo75
3 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Richard Yao @ 2013-01-07 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 410 bytes --]
On 01/06/2013 08:22 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> This is way past due so I'd like to get 4.6 into stable. There are hardly any
> blockers on bug #418383 which makes me go "?!", so if anyone knows of any
> issues please let us know.
>
>
>
We probably should not stabilize on ARM until the following is fixed:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401561
Other architectures are probably okay.
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 900 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-01-09 2:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-01-07 1:22 [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.6 stabilization Ryan Hill
2013-01-07 1:58 ` Anthony G. Basile
2013-01-07 8:54 ` Dirkjan Ochtman
2013-01-07 9:52 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2013-01-07 16:13 ` Richard Yao
2013-01-08 9:50 ` vivo75
2013-01-09 3:05 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox