From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59B351381F3 for ; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 18:15:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 79D8B21C088; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 18:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB00321C079 for ; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 18:15:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.132] (CPE002401f30b73-CM001cea3ddad8.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.242.65.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: axs) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A20B633D7A9 for ; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 18:15:11 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <50D4A738.5090107@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 13:15:20 -0500 From: Ian Stakenvicius User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.11) Gecko/20121208 Thunderbird/10.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: eudev project announcement References: <20121215203359.4552d807@pomiocik.lan> <1635723.VeYid7ZcB5@eve> <20121221162102.GA7261@linux1> <1417920.LHZgoe019u@eve> <50D4A1F9.3060808@gmail.com> <7010c872-a192-4885-83b8-962fc37ff56d@email.android.com> In-Reply-To: <7010c872-a192-4885-83b8-962fc37ff56d@email.android.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 3c987625-fc9a-4ad3-af09-b83193aebe50 X-Archives-Hash: 7923bc83a0011dfdab747419f76d0c4c -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 21/12/12 01:05 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote: > Dale wrote: > >> J. Roeleveld wrote: >>> However, it is, in my opinion, a workaround for a problem that >>> has been forced upon me. As soon as eudev is stable enough, I >>> will dump >> udev. >>>> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/441004 >>> Strange, I use a current-stable version of genkernel, /usr is >>> on LVM >> and the >>> system boots correctly without issues. >>> >>> -- Joost >>> >>> >> >> Same here. I have /usr on LVM and plan to use eudev as SOON as >> it is ready. I'm just waiting on someone to post that it is as >> easy as unmerging udev and emerging eudev and maybe a reboot. >> >> Dale >> >> :-) :-) > > As soon as the developers post it is ready for testing I will start > testing it on a few test VMs. If that works I will move it to my > desktop. When that also goes fine. I'll post about it on > gentoo-user. > > -- Joost Since this thread has actually gone back to being about eudev, I'll chime in here: I haven't tested this against separate-/usr but from my look at how ~arch lvm2 builds, it will -not- work against eudev-1_beta1 or eudev-9999 as it stands today in a separate-/usr environment. We will of course support this but support is not there yet. IMO it's not worth attempting at this point as it will most likely fail. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlDUpzgACgkQ2ugaI38ACPCZcwEAnwGAIK5+MjesTb5Eaw03Hr+m rgHVu8QQrAbLFyyUU7ABALby/1B+nwTct4Uze07V+//gX4ZRUw83+RzhwIQw/Mfh =ZgO4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----