From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF7251381F3 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 19:50:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 80C4E21C14A; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 19:50:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6809B21C058 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 19:49:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (pool-71-245-176-92.pitbpa.fios.verizon.net [71.245.176.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zerochaos) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1404333DAA9; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 19:49:25 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <50D0C8D2.1010405@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 14:49:38 -0500 From: "Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zac Medico CC: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, catalyst@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving our/portage stuff to var References: <50D0B819.3040507@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <50D0B819.3040507@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 94e73b92-ca90-4404-947b-c91239cb7653 X-Archives-Hash: d778150204b6d04003e1167f95b4cc60 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12/18/2012 01:38 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > On 12/17/2012 02:19 AM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: >> Currently we put portage into /usr/portage and all related stuff is to >> be in the subfolders there (distfiles, binpkg). >> >> I've always myself override these defaults in make.conf to point for >> /var/portage/ (not /var/lib because I never bothered enough how to >> make world and config files to be put elsewhere :P). >> >> The only reason why we have this currently in usr is that bsd ports >> put their stuff in there and I suppose Daniel just did the same. >> >> With respect to reality how stuff is done in the linux land all the >> variable data should be in /var so we should adjust and move it in >> there too. >> >> What would you think? > > I like the idea. As noted in bug #378603 [1], I'd like the portage > ebuild to ensure that the locations don't unexpectedly change for > existing installs. > > Will it break catalyst? If so, we might begin the migration by fixing > catalyst and having to set the new default locations in the make.conf > that it generates. > > [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378603#c1 > Yes, it will break catalyst. However, if the folder that the portage tree goes in is still something/something/portage then it shouldn't be hard to fix. - -ZC -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQ0MjSAAoJEKXdFCfdEflKTZ4P/2h5iKIGbNWhxAGkWEDRez31 YiCVUf5lJeDGAYpJ0hM20aWebzrR+HITqcKENKfGwerr+2/VeKVKsyYR8M1tNbQs 9jCNTMBfoYOEm8ElOu0Vzny5uWV3LflP0BMsnOjBDUpxw9ESXuz+54tkknsyEaLD yBoVoe4zj4GfY/B3aXO08gqig/w7sGR3iLPyhy3iJimznK/qMszyMJ9LzCFVSmwz zXVMoaM1VKTwVI7E/CZmxBWIF4KVoQ1fl4xJoqt4l82HK/5IDoRLu+s5c6rJLDhp SPDsFQa+XtdHOZvaXhn+15zAcWFJm8UBdXtnfi8tJmpoukEJr3BscC9DRUCdRzbR mzE0ptqDayoJ8tKuxUR+ppU987PPIAJ03h/X3yTWsIc7QPB1TtFI5W6mk4/iVPSy FF9LrcxYvAM/+Cqu+LlhKIapqK+XAA7nw6txpEjiw3HcTZ+0O/GGHTlKM0gxbx0i kMGe00zwodoN7DwGYenmulDk3eX71moZ/ioXMMNisDAazmcbOKOEXC/pmuUk342H 9oUtgYCH/PJGjdZHAlQnBwyfIP2YCNRZEnL6lN5t6V+p0XPzMB97tJCYsB2qEifx m1qOPZhQX5dXovKJZyrs93SbpkUhMF8TXi6IsosVtAQFldRd2LJOawRBEkZzF2Yn mn0gQl0ORyorOMEYsxbL =lZrh -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----